I think everyone who lives in the entirety of that land, all settlements included, should have the same rights enumerated in the US constitution, and they should all be able to elect representatives to govern by consent.
Without, honestly, trying to diss you: That is a lofty goal. I think that theoretically it is a good goal. I would love to see much of the world embrace the unalienable rights outlined by our founding fathers. However, "theoretically" is the key term. This is the kind of theory I would expect to hear from the professor in a geopolitics undergrad lecture. The kind of professor whose closest encounter to Middle Eastern Islam is the Palestinian restaurant in their college town.
Even in the US, to a disconcerting degree in the present, we have citizens who believe things as foundational as the First Amendment should be curtailed and that people should be imprisoned for free speech. Now jump to the ME, where pretty much every time the West has inserted itself to "help" an ME nation move towards democracy, it has failed. Taliban, Inc., and pretty much a large portion of the populations in ME countries (or at least the populations with the power) have, and have historically had, zero interest in "governing by consent of the governed".
It has failed every single time, and religious tribalism has won. They can build Dubais to wow the Western world, but travel 50KM out of that city, and you'll still be killed for asserting your unalienable rights, if they offend the beliefs of the local populace.
