Author Topic: California bill would require speed limiters on cars  (Read 718 times)

WLJ

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 28,275
  • On Patrol In The Epsilon Eridani System
California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« on: January 25, 2024, 06:00:25 PM »
Apparently they intend for it to know the posted speed limit by GPS and limit you to no more than 10+ that.
I could see this being open to hacking by carjackers.

Quote
It would require any new car or truck made or sold in the state in 2027 or later to have special technology installed in the car called "speed governors." The device would make it physically impossible for vehicles to go 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limits.

"I don't think it's at all an overreach, and I don't think most people would view it as an overreach, we have speed limits, I think most people support speed limits because people know that speed kills," Wiener said.

Proposed CA bill would electronically restrict cars from going over speed limit
https://abc7.com/california-speed-limits-proposed-bill-governors/14358919/

 Proposed State Law Would Require All New Cars to Have Speed Limiters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxPAro4rB1k
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us".
- Calvin and Hobbes

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,868
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2024, 06:54:00 PM »
My CA driving experience is mostly limited to LA and the bay area, where speed limits are more of an aspirational thing that you hope you might see one day before you die.

Over here in FL however,  it's clear the vast majority of the driving public does NOT "support speed limits because people know that speed kills,". 10-15 over the speed limit is common when the interstate is moving, and you'll still routinely be passed. 

P.S. Move over.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,010
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2024, 07:01:32 PM »
My CA driving experience is mostly limited to LA and the bay area, where speed limits are more of an aspirational thing that you hope you might see one day before you die.

Over here in FL however,  it's clear the vast majority of the driving public does NOT "support speed limits because people know that speed kills,". 10-15 over the speed limit is common when the interstate is moving, and you'll still routinely be passed. 

P.S. Move over.

Lots of CA has places to go well over the 65-70mph speed limits, and lots of people do. Regardless of any of that though, I would wonder how they will make these governors work.

In every state that I have traveled and used GPS, whether onboard or Google nav, the programs have an option to view your speed and the speed limit on a particular road. I have many, many times seen that display go blank on the speed limit because I was on a road for which the nav didn't seem to know the speed limit. I have less often seen the actual road sign speed limit be higher or lower than what nav displayed, I assume from some local change in speed laws for a road.

So what happens when you hit a road for which there is no speed data? I certainly don't expect CA state government to have or create a better system than google nav. Do you get to drive as fast as you want? Will it limit you to 25mph?
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,634
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2024, 07:07:19 PM »
. . . I could see this being open to hacking by carjackers . . .
A lot of cars come from the factory with the engine controls set to limit the maximum speed of a vehicle; with many upper end German cars I've read it's 155, Japanese companies like Toyota won't comment. You can sometimes get an idea of what a new car's top speed is by the rating of the tires it's shipped with. (I don't know if the AMG modified Mercedes cars are top speed limited.) And of course there are PLENTY of cars that from the factory will exceed 155, all it takes is money.

Seeing as there are various ways people have defeated the factory limitations, I see a cottage industry springing up to defeat these proposed limiters.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,966
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2024, 07:11:11 PM »
I'd like to know the legal requirement if the vehicle cannot obtain GPS location, or has no data for speed limit at a given location.

You'd likely see two competing grey market solutions.  Either an antenna removal service, or a location override that jams real GPS data for your car and feeds it fake location data.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

WLJ

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 28,275
  • On Patrol In The Epsilon Eridani System
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2024, 07:12:15 PM »
And GPSs can be jammed and spoofed. What does the car do in that case?
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us".
- Calvin and Hobbes

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,868
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2024, 07:41:49 PM »
Many modern cars augment their speed limit detection with software in the forward facing cameras that actually recognizes speed limit signs.  Each manufacturer would probably vary it a little bit, but I'd expect a common solution would be a mix of traffic sign camera, GPS, and location from info the car's cell phone antenna.  It would probably take some reasonably spiffy coding to dig it out of the car's computers.  Not to say it couldn't be done, but it's unlikely to be as easy as unplugging an antenna.

As far as speed limiters, almost all cars have one, and have had one for 26-30 years, at minimum.  I can tell you for a fact that my Grandma's 94 Outback and my mom's 96 Saturn were governed at 105mph.  My 96 Mustang GT was governed at and my 03 Cobra was governed at 159.  I bounced off all of them at one point or another.  When I cranked up the boost and chipped the Cobra we took the speed limiter out.

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2024, 07:54:45 PM »
The built in nav system in my 2015 Jeep Wrangler will display current speed limit and actual speed on the display.

I've got no problem with speed limiters as a concept. Let's limit it to 5 MPH over the posted limit. Nobody needs a vehicle capable of exceeding the posted speed limit except police and first responders (and military).

My BWM R1250RT is supposedly limited to 145 MPH for the US version. I can't say for sure since I've only had it up to 140.  =D
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

griz

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,042
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2024, 08:19:59 PM »
The built in nav system in my 2015 Jeep Wrangler will display current speed limit and actual speed on the display.

I've got no problem with speed limiters as a concept. Let's limit it to 5 MPH over the posted limit. Nobody needs a vehicle capable of exceeding the posted speed limit except police and first responders (and military).

My BWM R1250RT is supposedly limited to 145 MPH for the US version. I can't say for sure since I've only had it up to 140.  =D

So you were on a road where the speed limit was 135?
Sent from a stone age computer via an ordinary keyboard.

JTHunter

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,932
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2024, 09:41:48 PM »
And what happens to somebody that is being "stalked"?  What if that stalker is on a large motorcycle instead of a car or truck?  The "pursued" won't be able to escape the "pursuee".
The "Civil War" was fought because one part of the country was "dictating" to a different part of the country HOW they should live their lives.
"Commiefornia" is doing the same thing now.
“I have little patience with people who take the Bill of Rights for granted.  The Bill of Rights, contained in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, is every American’s guarantee of freedom.” - - President Harry S. Truman, “Years of Trial and Hope”

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,881
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2024, 05:31:04 PM »
RoadKingLarry:

"I've got no problem with speed limiters as a concept. Let's limit it to 5 MPH over the posted limit. Nobody needs a vehicle capable of exceeding the posted speed limit except police and first responders (and military)."

Like.  Roffle.

WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

Blakenzy

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,020
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2024, 05:36:50 PM »
Car won't start. Code 000-FU. GPS signal not found... please look for clear view of sky before starting engine. *You are on floor -3 parking.
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives. A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps both"

Jim147

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,593
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2024, 07:20:48 PM »
When I was young, I had no idea what speed ratings on tires meant. I don't know how many times I was over 140mph on old bias ply tires.
Sometimes we carry more weight then we owe.
And sometimes goes on and on and on.

BAH-WEEP-GRAAAGHNAH WHEEP NI-NI BONG

zahc

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,797
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2024, 12:42:55 AM »
It's about time. I'll be the first one to apply for 25mph geofencing for my neighborhood.

GPS alone probably won't work, but there's a variety of positioning technologies that would. If this takes off, it will probably take the form of a radio signal like they use at home depot here to update the digital price tags.
Maybe a rare occurence, but then you only have to get murdered once to ruin your whole day.
--Tallpine

Nick1911

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,492
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2024, 02:01:35 AM »
The part that annoys me is that they codified 10 mph over as acceptable. If it's a legal speed limit, and you're going to require a mechanism to enforce it on the car... Enforce it.  Or change the speed limit.

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,881
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2024, 07:43:29 AM »
Control, control, control... why do you think I wanted to be elected?
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,634
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2024, 09:31:24 AM »
Control, control, control... why do you think I wanted to be elected?
Pretend you're a Democrat, and maybe the DNC election committee will help provide enough margin of fraud to put you in office.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,881
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2024, 12:42:20 PM »
The part that annoys me is that they codified 10 mph over as acceptable. If it's a legal speed limit, and you're going to require a mechanism to enforce it on the car... Enforce it.  Or change the speed limit.

I didn't know bureaucrats had to be rational.  Just electable.

I haven't researched it in decades, but it useta be you could request an audit of speeds used on a stretch of road from the Highway Patrol which could (or maybe had to ) be used for posting speed limits.  I always thought it was ridiculous because if you saw a police car in the area monitoring speeds, you'd (naturally) slow down.  Which would affect the sample.

But it brought up the question of how speed limits are determined in the first place. I just assumed it was "some petty functionary with a clipboard" plucking a number from the air, and let it go at that.    I'm sure some are determined by statute, but in general, is there someone actually empowered to set speed limit numbers?  (Naturally, I'm thinking of the implications of the Bruen decision...)

Terry, 230RN

« Last Edit: January 29, 2024, 01:15:01 PM by 230RN »
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,868
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2024, 12:49:23 PM »
State DOT's are the deciding fator usually, but they take "input" from the feds. 

Excluding the whole "55mph to save gas" bruhahah, generally speaking the speed limit is set by the road's construction.  Standardized road designs have emerged over the years, and new roads are built to meet the standard of the speed the planners want traffic to move, or in the cases where they can't build whatever road they want, the speed is set by the road design they can build.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,010
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2024, 12:56:27 PM »
State DOT's are the deciding fator usually, but they take "input" from the feds. 

Excluding the whole "55mph to save gas" bruhahah, generally speaking the speed limit is set by the road's construction.  Standardized road designs have emerged over the years, and new roads are built to meet the standard of the speed the planners want traffic to move, or in the cases where they can't build whatever road they want, the speed is set by the road design they can build.

Or else it's Oregon, where all the speed limits are set for grandmas.  =D

I swear, I get screwed on speed limits. Either I'm driving into Oregon, where it tops out at 55mph most everywhere I go (I get a short section of 70mph on the way to Home Despot), or else the 90% of my "daily driving" into the cities in Idaho is on one of the only 65mph sections of the interstate. I have like 1/4 mile where I can do 80mph.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,868
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #20 on: January 29, 2024, 01:10:40 PM »
Or else it's Oregon, where all the speed limits are set for grandmas.  =D

I swear, I get screwed on speed limits. Either I'm driving into Oregon, where it tops out at 55mph most everywhere I go (I get a short section of 70mph on the way to Home Despot), or else the 90% of my "daily driving" into the cities in Idaho is on one of the only 65mph sections of the interstate. I have like 1/4 mile where I can do 80mph.

[squints in FL]

Why would you not go 80 on the interstate?

 >:D

fifth_column

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,705
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #21 on: January 29, 2024, 01:20:41 PM »
Perhaps the tech should be rolled out to all public sector employee vehicles first.

Seriously, I could see this being useful for school buses, public transit, DPW vehicles; essentially all non-emergency municipal, county, and state vehicles.
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will... The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. ― Frederick Douglass

No American citizen should be willing to accept a government that uses its power against its own people.  -  Catherine Engelbrecht

zahc

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,797
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #22 on: January 29, 2024, 03:49:04 PM »
The CA proposal is sort of a nothingburger that makes good headlines. There is no actually attempt to determine the local speed limit. It's just calling for 80mph governors. Like the ones certain company vehicles already have, that limit max speed. It's not a crazy idea and cars already have speed governors in the ECU's...the value depends on the car; Japanese cars seem to like 110mph. CA is just saying it should be lower, like 80. The highest speed limit in the state of CA is 70mph, so I guess they figure 80mph gives enough room for passing or whatever. It wouldn't do anything for speeding on lower - speed roads, but it would prevent the kind of extreme speeding you see in high speed chases or daredevil incidents. Or even mysterious events like that car that drove into the toll bridge at like 100+mph in NY... I always figured that was either a suicide or medical emergency.

One does wonder what happens if people buy a car in California and then go to Idaho or TX where they have 80 or 85mph speed limits. So it doesn't seem very well thought-out, like a lot of junk that comes out of CA.

They 80mph governor doesn't even seem that impactful because that type of highway speeding causes pretty spectacular crashes when they happen, but I think a lot of the road carnage is happening on urban and peri-urban arterials with lower speed limits, where people systematically speed.

There are systems out there that CAN use map data to limit speed by location, and the systems are already mandatory in EU countries, since 2022. They usually just display the current speed limit and beep at you if you speed, but they are advisory and can always be overridden IME. I can say it's kinda nice to have the speed limit always display in the dash along with your actual speed.

I know too much about speed limits because I'm on one of my road department's advisory committees. Most road departments consider the speed limit to be a property of the road, not something that you can optionally choose by policy. Speed limits are supposed to be set by the 85th percentile of speed that drivers naturally drive on that road, when there is no traffic.  Under this system, the speed limit gives the driver some kind of real information about the road ahead. The road departments usually don't want to lower the speed limit for other concerns, like noise or not killing children (if they die it's just their fault). And besides, people ignore speed limit signs anyway, so there is a logic to this 85th percentile system. If you go around randomly lowering speed limits for other reasons, like because the neighborhood complained, the idea is drivers will catch onto this after seeing a bunch of 25mph roads that you can easily drive 40mph on, and they will start ignoring speed limits, and then when they go on a road that's actually a real "85th percentile" 25mph road, they will ignore the speed limit, assume they can get away with going 40, and crash.

Instead, if you want to lower the road speed because of noise, not killing children, etc., what you are supposed to do is redesign the road to a 25mph standard, and then people actually will naturally go 25mph according to the 85th percentile doctrine. You narrow the lanes to 9ft, put in curves, islands, or speed bumps, plant trees near the side of the road, in other words, design it appropriately, and wala, you have an actual 25mph road, which people who ignore the speed limit actually go 25mph on, and you also maintain the 85th percentile "speed limit is X and we mean it" doctrine. The problem is that re-designing roads is expensive. And road departments are very un-intelligent (I struggle to think of a discipline I respect less). The result is lots of roads have already been built going through residential or urban areas that probably are 30mph, but are built to 40 or 50mph standards, where people are tired of the noise, tired of speeders, and/or tired of sacrificing children on the altar of car culture, and they want to drop the speed limit but the road departments 1) won't let them without redesigning the road and 2) can't afford to redesign the road. If enough children die in one place, then sometimes they will do something. Sometimes. But then they fail to make those same design changes elsewhere, at least until enough blood has flowed.
Maybe a rare occurence, but then you only have to get murdered once to ruin your whole day.
--Tallpine

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,966
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2024, 04:13:28 PM »
Quote
There are systems out there that CAN use map data to limit speed by location, and the systems are already mandatory in EU countries, since 2022. They usually just display the current speed limit and beep at you if you speed, but they are advisory and can always be overridden IME. I can say it's kinda nice to have the speed limit always display in the dash along with your actual speed.

My Aprilia motorcycle sort of does this, but only when I engage the navigation software.  And it only works if I pair the bike to my smartphone, so it has GPS and data services.  But on my map screen on the dash, it shows my current speed, my next turn (sort of like a motocross rally road book), and the local speed limit.  It doesn't introduce itself between the throttle input and the engine though, I can exceed the speed limit all I want.

Rally road book:


I can't find online pics of the Tuareg navigation screens, but it's nothing like your typical Google Maps interface with an overhead map and triangle avatar... it's turn by turn directions much like a road book.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,010
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: California bill would require speed limiters on cars
« Reply #24 on: January 29, 2024, 04:40:40 PM »
One does wonder what happens if people buy a car in California and then go to Idaho or TX where they have 80 or 85mph speed limits. So it doesn't seem very well thought-out, like a lot of junk that comes out of CA.

Just like vehicle pollution control devices, stupid gas can pour spouts, etc., California figures (and they have been right) that they have the economic clout to force it everywhere. Carmakers won't make a CA specific car, so the rest of us will get the lowest common denominator stuff and have to suck it up, or find workarounds (FTR, all of my gas cans are "water cans").
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."