Kim really ought to think twice about this one. Or as many times as necessary. He's reading a lot of imaginary penumbra that simply isn't there, while ignoring what the founders actually said. If we wish the second amendment to be taken seriously and read in a common-sense fashion, we'll have to do the same with the third.
The amendment forbids a forced quartering of troops. In time of peace. In time of war, such mandatory quartering must be in accordance with the law. That's all it says. Quartering troops is not the same thing as installing surveillance cameras. Or mandatory govt. inspections for seditious literature or porn or untaxed whiskey, or whatever. By duToit's reasoning, in-home surveillance (which he makes equivalent to quartering troops) might be Constitutional, so long as war has been declared. That is, if he actually bothered to read the amendment, instead of speculating about what it could mean.
