Now now, let's be fair.
#1. She was under a lot of stress and probably smart enough to realize referring to endangered animals and/or suffering in third world countries is how you win these things.
#2. The question itself was bull. My response would be "I question the veracity of that statement. It's useless to speculate on it until we have some better evidence this bold claim is true. In fact, I think we should be questioning how we gather information..." etc.
But that's not really attempting to answer the question, even if it is a valid response. She couldn't answer the question by challenging it in a beauty contest.
So if you were 17, under a lot of stress, given a bull #### question, and knew all of your answers had to do with something that appeals to bleeding heart liberals, you might make just as little sense.
But yeah, that was hilarious. Poor Caitlin.