Author Topic: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!  (Read 29677 times)

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #50 on: November 25, 2007, 06:20:59 AM »
how do you quantify quite a few?  and what makes you think they would talk candidly to you?bearin mind the cultural barriers against it. but hey maybe you are right but what do i know i'm only 1/2 japanese been to japan. i suspect at best you are mistaken at worst deliberatly so

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #51 on: November 25, 2007, 09:56:43 AM »
...hey maybe you are right but what do i know i'm only 1/2 japanese been to japan...

How many did you meet in Japan that are grateful for the atomic bombings? Or believe that Truman saved Japanese lives in so doing?

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #52 on: November 25, 2007, 10:13:45 AM »
grateful? thats a stretch   but folk who understand the reason behind the first bomb and are accepting of it plenty. all my family on thjt side except one cousin    so len did you accidentally forget to quantify your experience?  you wouldn't be dodging are ya?

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #53 on: November 25, 2007, 10:52:58 AM »
grateful? thats a stretch   but folk who understand the reason behind the first bomb and are accepting of it plenty. all my family on thjt side except one cousin

I defer to your claim, since I wasn't there: bunches of Japanese people appreciate having been a-bombed

Quote
so len did you accidentally forget to quantify your experience?  you wouldn't be dodging are ya?

You didn't "quantify" yours, for that matter. The question is impossible to answer accurately; I've known lots of Japanese people in college and grad school, but as I've admitted, never been to Japan. But none of that's relevant, since I'm not claiming personal knowledge of what Japanese people think. If you're correct, and I can't prove you wrong, the Japanese themselves have bought the propaganda which we know full well to be a lie: almost all of Truman's commanders opposed the bombing, including: General Douglas McArthur; chief of staff, Admiral William Leahy; chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest J. King; Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz; Admiral William "Bull" Halsey; Rear Admiral Lewis L. Strauss; commanding general of the U.S. Army Air Forces Henry H. "Hap" Arnold; General Claire Chennault of the Flying Tigers; Army Strategic Air Forces Commander Carl Spatz; and Army Air Force General Curtis "Bombs Away" Lemay.

Then of course there was the United States Strategic Bombing Survey of 1946, which said in part,

Quote
Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.

The claim that half a million American lives were saved is a myth that began some time after the fact; the actual projection for an invasion of Kyushu was under 50,000 casualties[1]. Truman himself never claimed that he dropped the bombs to save Japanese lives. Rather, he said things like, "When you deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast. It is most regrettable but nevertheless true[2]."

Truman also lied outright to the American people. On August 9, 1945, he stated: "The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians." The next day he commented to his cabinet concerning his reluctance to drop a third bomb because, "The thought of wiping out another 100,000 people was too horrible." He added that he didn't like the idea of killing "all those kids[3]."
 
The bottom line is that the Japanese were ready to surrender. All they asked was that Hirohito be spared (which, in the end, he was). Instead, they were nuked. Twice.

--Len.



[1] Barton J. Bernstein, "A post-War Myth: 500,000 U.S. Lives Saved," Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 42, 6 (June/July 1986), 38-40.

[2] Alperovitz, Decision, p. 563.

[3] Barton J. Bernstein, "Understanding the Atomic Bomb and the Japanese Surrender: Missed Opportunities, Little-Known Near Disasters, and Modern Memory," Diplomatic History 19, no. 2 (Spring 1995): 257.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

Werewolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Lead, Follow or Get the HELL out of the WAY!
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #54 on: November 25, 2007, 11:30:31 AM »
Quote
The bottom line is that the Japanese were ready to surrender. All they asked was that Hirohito be spared (which, in the end, he was). Instead, they were nuked. Twice.
Firebombed, nuked - ehhh! In the end dead is dead. The japanese got what they deserved whether it saved a single life or no.
Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love
truly, Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you smile.

Fight Me Online

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #55 on: November 25, 2007, 12:46:41 PM »
The Japanese got what they deserved whether it saved a single life or no.

I rest my case.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #56 on: November 25, 2007, 01:38:08 PM »
len there are japanese folk with very strong feelings vis a vis the bombs. i'm more critical than nmost of them. the first bomb was to force surrender the seco0nd was payback. to imagine that some lessor force would cause the japanese to surrender is symptomatic of the inability of the western mind to understand other cultures.westerners can't fathom the kamikazee philosophy nbut its was very reaL

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #57 on: November 25, 2007, 04:29:21 PM »
to imagine that some lessor force would cause the japanese to surrender is symptomatic of the inability of the western mind to understand other cultures.
QFT
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #58 on: November 25, 2007, 04:41:05 PM »
forgive me but i'm old enough to know that when i don't know for sure what something means ask   so     QFT?

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #59 on: November 26, 2007, 04:12:05 AM »
forgive me but i'm old enough to know that when i don't know for sure what something means ask   so     QFT?

It means "quoted for truth." In other words, he seconds your assertion that the people who already had offered to surrender, multiple times, would never have surrendered without being nuked.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #60 on: November 26, 2007, 07:37:55 AM »
that would be the same folks who refused the terms of surrender offered them and chose to keep negotiating?
i call it nuclear guilt  not too different than white guilt and often occurs in same places.  let me let you off the hook len.  i can assure you and all your round eyed brothers that the japanese woulda cheerfully nuked the us , or anyone else. if they could

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #61 on: November 26, 2007, 08:00:18 AM »
that would be the same folks who refused the terms of surrender offered them and chose to keep negotiating?

Reference? I already gave some. The only condition they stipulated was that Hirohito not be deposed--and in fact he was not. They refused unconditional surrender, which was an unreasonable demand in the first place. You can't erase their multiple offers to surrender by waving your hands at it.

Quote
i can assure you and all your round eyed brothers that the japanese woulda cheerfully nuked the us , or anyone else. if they could

A person of mixed Japanese parentage who buys the demonization of one parent's entire people. Amazing. Then again we have Joe Farah: an Arab who claims that Arabs understand nothing except overwhelming force. So there are precedents.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #62 on: November 26, 2007, 08:28:44 AM »
len  once again poster child for western interprtation of the eastern world.
len at that time many japanese woulda kept you in a zoo to bring the kids to see on a holiday. killing you woulda been regarded with the same import that folks here place on shooting a coyote in the chicken house.  amongst the more enlightened you'd have been elevated to the same delicate sensibilities we showed the indian tribes as we flattened them. it wouldn't be personal, ya'll would be in the way and have to go.take a look at what happened in china or any other parts of the world the japanese coopted. a nuke or 2 would actually be merciful. heck i forget the details but the japanese were on the nuclear hunt in a small way and you should thank stars they were behind us.that is probably just as good luck as the carriers being at sea instead of pearl.

as to the blather about demonization? thats more your thing than mine len. you see to me what they did made sense given their circumstance at the time. i don't think of them as demons at all heck if the war's gone the other way it woulda been like shermans march to the sea. instant hero

"We, acting by command of and on behalf of the Emperor of Japan, the Japanese Government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters, hereby accept the provisions in the declaration issued by the heads of the Governments of the United States, China, and Great Britain 26 July 1945 at Potsdam, and subsequently to by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which four powers are hereafter referred to as the Allied Powers.

"We hereby proclaim the unconditional surrender to the Allied Powers of the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters and of all Japanese Armed Forces and all Armed Forces under Japanese control wherever situated.

"We hereby command all Japanese forces wherever situated and the Japanese people to cease hostilities forthwith, to preserve and save from damage all ships, aircraft, and military and civil property, and to comply with all requirements which may be imposed by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers or by agencies of the Japanese Government at his direction.

"We hereby command the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters to issue at once orders to the commanders of all Japanese forces and all forces under Japanese control wherever situated to surrender unconditionally themselves and all forces under their control.

"We hereby command all civil, military, and naval officials to obey and enforce all proclamations, orders, and directives deemed by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers to be proper to effectuate this surrender and issued by him or under his authority; and we direct all such officials to remain at their posts and to continue to perform their non-combatant duties unless specifically relieved by him or under his authority.

"We hereby undertake for the Emperor, the Japanese Government, and their successors to carry out the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration in good faith, and to issue whatever orders and take whatever action may be required by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers or by any other designated representative of the Allied Powers for the purpose of giving effect to that declaration.

"We hereby command the Japanese Imperial Government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters at once to liberate all Allied Prisoners of War and civilian internees now under Japanese control and to provide for their protection, care, maintenance, and immediate transportation to places as directed.

"The authority of the Emperor and the Japanese Government to rule the State shall be subject to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, who will take such steps as he deems proper to effectuate these terms of surrender".

Signed of TOKYO BAY, JAPAN of 09.04 on the SECOND day of SEPTEMBER, 1945

Mamoru Shigemitsu By Command and in behalf of the Emperor of Japan and the Japanese Government

Yoshijiro Umezu By Command and in behalf of the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters

Accepted at TOKYO BAY, JAPAN at 0908 on the SECOND day of SEPTEMBER, 1945, for the United States, Republic of China, United Kingdom and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and in the interests of the other United Nations at war with Japan.

Douglas MacArthur
Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers

C.W. Nimitz
United States Representative

Hsu Yung-Ch'ang
Republic of China Representative

Bruce Fraser
United Kingdom Representative

Kuzma Derevyanko
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Representative

Thomas Blamey
Commonwealth of Australia Representative

L. Moore Cosgrave
Dominion of Canada Representative

Jacques Leclerc
Provisional Government of the French Republic Representative

C.E.L. Helfrich
Kingdom of the Netherlands Representative

Leonard M. Isitt
Dominion of New Zealand Representative

as always len i am amazed at the depth of your insight into the eastern mindset   i'm thinking of starting a thread on natural childbirth and await with bated breath your insight and expertise on that subject as well





Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #63 on: November 26, 2007, 08:32:46 AM »
When they say things like "Islam absolutely forbids the manufacture and use of nuclear weapons", that's not relevant, because it puts a monkeywrench in the "Islam is bad" machine.

"The sons of Adam are accountable for all lies with these exceptions: During war because war is deception, to reconcile among two quarreling men, and for a man to appease his wife." -Mohammed

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #64 on: November 26, 2007, 08:36:21 AM »
len  once again poster child for western interprtation of the eastern world.

You keep making these personal remarks, but not addressing the fact that they did in fact offer to surrender.

Quote
len at that time many japanese woulda kept you in a zoo to bring the kids to see on a holiday. killing you woulda been regarded with the same import that folks here place on shooting a coyote... as to the blather about demonization? thats more your thing than mine len...

I hope the irony is abundantly clear here.

Quote
"We hereby proclaim the unconditional surrender to the Allied Powers of the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters and of all Japanese Armed Forces and all Armed Forces under Japanese control wherever situated.

Yup. They surrendered. I don't know if you realize that the Japanese high command intended to refuse to surrender, until Hirohito talked them into it. See, though they wanted to surrender a long time before, they still insisted on the single condition that Hirohito not be deposed. It was Hirohito himself who convinced them to surrender unconditionally despite the risks to himself. Which isn't to say that he wasn't a slant-eyed devil, evil incarnate, yadda yadda.

Quote
as always len i am amazed at the depth of your insight into the eastern mindset   i'm thinking of starting a thread on natural childbirth and await with bated breath your insight and expertise on that subject as well

More personal remarks, yet so far zero in the area of factual citations. Citing their surrender only proves that they ultimately did surrender, which was not in dispute.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #65 on: November 26, 2007, 08:41:49 AM »
None of these hopes were borne out. After the defeats of the Marianas campaign at the Philippine Sea and Saipan, and faced with the prospect of an invasion of the Japanese Home Islands, the War Journal of the Imperial Headquarters concluded: "We can no longer direct the war with any hope of success. The only course left is for Japan's one hundred million people to sacrifice their lives by charging the enemy to make them lose the will to fight."[4]

In February 1945, Prince Fumimaro Konoe gave to Emperor Hirohito a memorandum about his analysis of the situation and told him that if the war continued, the Imperial house might be in greater danger from an internal revolution than from defeat. [5] According to the diary of Grand Chamberlain Hisanori Fujita, the Emperor, looking for a tennozan, replied that it was premature to seek peace, "unless we make one more military gain".



The Foreign Ministry sent telegrams to the Allies, announcing that Japan would accept the Potsdam Declaration but would not comprise any demand which would prejudice the prerogatives of the Emperor. That effectively meant that the Tenno would remain a position of real power within the government  power that was normally wielded in his name by the people at the tops of the military and governmental hierarchies.

The response from the Allies was received on August 12. On the status of the Emperor it said,

"From the moment of surrender the authority of the Emperor and the Japanese government to rule the state shall be subject to the Supreme Commander of the Allied powers who will take such steps as he deems proper to effectuate the surrender terms. ...
The ultimate form of government of Japan shall, in accordance with the Potsdam Declaration, be established by the freely expressed will of the Japanese people."
At the following cabinet meeting, Suzuki argued that they must reject this and insist on an explicit guarantee for the Imperial system. Anami returned to his position that there be no occupation of Japan. Afterwards, Togo told Suzuki that there was no hope of getting better terms, and Kido conveyed the Emperor's will that Japan surrender. In a meeting with the Emperor, Yonai spoke of his concerns about growing civil unrest,

"I think the term is inappropriate, but the atomic bombs and the Soviet entry into the war are, in a sense, divine gifts. This way we don't have to say that we have quit the war because of domestic circumstances."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrender_of_Japan

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #66 on: November 26, 2007, 08:44:55 AM »
last paragraph and first one were the kicker

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #67 on: November 26, 2007, 09:15:04 AM »
last paragraph and first one were the kicker

Especially the last. The Emperor purportedly is glad that some 200,000 of his subjects were killed because it gave him political cover for the surrender he was already prepared to make before the first bomb fell.

And here you claimed that the Eastern mind is alien to us in the West! Hirohito sounds like Cheney and company, for whom 9/11 was a godsend--of just the sort that PNAC wished for.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #68 on: November 26, 2007, 09:27:31 AM »
"len at that time many japanese woulda kept you in a zoo to bring the kids to see on a holiday. killing you woulda been regarded with the same import that folks here place on shooting a coyote... as to the blather about demonization? thats more your thing than mine len...


I hope the irony is abundantly clear here."



once again len you serve as the best illustration
in your imaginary world the idea of you being put in a zoo is intrinsically eveil and my reference to it is demonizing my family. in the real world i live in its neither evil or good  it njust is.  that how truth works its not good or bad it just is. i'm no more ashamed or proud of that way of thinking than i am ashamed or proud about my height or haircolor. your not bad or good in that your mind can't bend around this way of thinking your just roundeyedin your mindset. it takes years of immersion to get a westerner to think eastern and most simply aren't capable

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #69 on: November 26, 2007, 09:34:41 AM »
in your imaginary world the idea of you being put in a zoo is intrinsically eveil and my reference to it is demonizing my family.

It would be evil if it were true, but it's BS. Are you claiming that ALL Japanese would like to see all non-Japanese in cages? Or MOST of them? Or even MANY? If so, how do you account for their subsequent embrace of baseball, Hello Kitty and all things western? A generation of hardest hard-core racists gave birth to a generation of relatively normal human beings (except for their unaccountable love of noodles and paper walls)?

Even more interesting would be your experience. If 1/10th of what you say is true, then their hatred for half-bloods would exceed their hatred for foreigners. Was that your experience? And if you experienced bigotry wile in Japan, then perhaps it isn't so much a question of your superior grasp of the "eastern mindset," but rather your own personal demons talking.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #70 on: November 26, 2007, 09:36:36 AM »
in your imaginary world the idea of you being put in a zoo is intrinsically eveil and my reference to it is demonizing my family.

It would be evil if it were true, but it's BS. Are you claiming that ALL Japanese would like to see all non-Japanese in cages? Or MOST of them? Or even MANY? If so, how do you account for their subsequent embrace of baseball, Hello Kitty and all things western? A generation of hardest hard-core racists gave birth to a generation of relatively normal human beings (except for their unaccountable love of noodles and paper walls)?

Even more interesting would be your experience. If 1/10th of what you say is true, then their hatred for half-bloods would exceed their hatred for foreigners. Was that your experience? And if you experienced bigotry wile in Japan, then perhaps it isn't so much a question of your superior grasp of the "eastern mindset," but rather your own personal demons talking."






len amongst the ideas you are less informed on is the depths of isolation pre ww2 in japan. the average person saw round eyes as baby eaters  less than human  had been taught that for generations and had no way or reason to know otherwise. again its not good or bad its just the way it was.

you truly demonstrate your miraculous understanding(miraculous since its based on the countless japanese you met here and got to know in depth, a hint len you don't get that close that fast  even a guy with your open personality)
of things japanese when you use the word "if" vis a vis my status as a 1/2 breed in japan. you made me laugh. len 1/2 breeds like me were a national shame and disgrace. i'd have more atatus as a black man in japan than as a mixed kid.it could be worse in korea they torture and sometimes castrate kids like me  at least the japanese are polite about their attitude.if you were that clueless on such a fundemental core of kjapanese culture it doesn't speak well for the fine details you pretend to grasp. and again here you try to assign some good or evil label to the behavior and thats so roundeye. it just is  not good not bad  you keep teying len and you might be able to get it  i doubt it the only westerners that do have open minds . so you are hamstrung from the word go   but i admire folks who attempt to stretch their limitations and boundaries



roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #71 on: November 26, 2007, 09:49:45 AM »
forgive me but i'm old enough to know that when i don't know for sure what something means ask   so     QFT?

It means "quoted for truth." In other words, he seconds your assertion that the people who already had offered to surrender, multiple times, would never have surrendered without being nuked.

--Len.

Len:

If you attempt to write for someone, please muster the integrity to get their positions correct.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #72 on: November 26, 2007, 09:54:33 AM »
forgive me but i'm old enough to know that when i don't know for sure what something means ask   so     QFT?

It means "quoted for truth." In other words, he seconds your assertion that the people who already had offered to surrender, multiple times, would never have surrendered without being nuked.

If you attempt to write for someone, please muster the integrity to get their positions correct.

There's no knowing exactly why you said "QFT." Presumably, you were seconding the bit you quoted. If so, then my summary is sarcastic but accurate: Cassandra's Daddy is claiming that the Japanese would have fought to the last man had we not nuked them.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • Guest
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #73 on: November 26, 2007, 09:58:06 AM »
ledn maybe you need to get outside your box  talk to some service folks who have actually been to japan, i mean in real life as opposed to in their imagination after talkinf=g to some exchange students. better yet talk to some foreign service folks. but unless they spent years there they are gonna be almost as limited as you.best deal would find yourself a service guy who "went asiatic" i had a neighbor like that   redneck hill billy from tennesee went over loved it finally retired there. my family joked about him being more japanese than me.  the reallity is out there you just need to leave lens world to find it., expand your horizons a lil change is good once you get past the fear

Len Budney

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,023
Re: Mutually Assued Destruction? Yeah, I'll Have Some of That!
« Reply #74 on: November 26, 2007, 10:00:43 AM »
ledn maybe you need to get outside your box... the reallity is out there you just need to leave lens world to find it., expand your horizons a lil change is good once you get past the fear

Do you have anything to add other than poorly spelled and punctuated personal jibes? Just wondering.

Meanwhile, you might have leaked something in your rant. I gather that your time in Japan was spent as a US serviceman. If so, it explains some things, and also makes the bit about getting "outside your box" extra ironic and funny.

--Len.
In a cannibal society, vegetarians arouse suspicion.