I'm not sure why local emergency workers on-scene would intentionally sabotage vehicle flow so that news crews would get more dramatic footage. That's a real reach. I think that is a case of too many people trying to get close to the school to do their jobs resulting in chaos, not a TV director's orders.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/12/18/quebec-lauren-rousseau-conn.html
Watch the video embedded in this page, and look at the bullet holes in the car. There's something off about them. The passenger A-pillar hole looks like an exit hole, while the passenger door hole looks like an entry hole.
So the assertion is that someone was firing from a vehicle driven by a substitute teacher who was one of the victims? And that someone else was shooting at the shooter in the vehicle and hit once (but clearly didn't hit the shooter since there was no report of blood in the car)?
I agree that the bullet holes are odd, but I'd believe a strange ricochet before I'd consider that proof of another shooter in the car. A single bullet hole in either direction says fluke long before it says two-way shootout.
The police definitely chased down someone in the woods outside the school. There's video of it. But no news as to what this person was doing or who he was. Watch this video around the 8 minute point:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KlOJd-Psc9w
When there is an active shooter scenario, cops don't just go rushing straight to the shooter and ignore everyone else. They are as confused as anyone and if someone is spotted near the scene, they are probably going to get knocked down and cuffed. If they turn out to be an innocent birdwatcher or a staff member seeking refuge from a hail of bullets inside the school, it probably won't be reported as a major incident on CNN. Can you imagine a news agency reporting on every person that the cops detained and then cleared during their response? It would take weeks to even put that sort of list together, and who cares about people who were cleared?
Robbie Parker? The grin is weird, for sure.
Look, we know that anti-gun politicians and organizations are dancing with glee in the blood of these kids. There's no conspiracy necessary to show that. We know they are pushing for new, oppressively strict legislation - no conspiracy needed. Did some local politician or sociopathic "grief-stricken father" try to milk their 15 minutes? Sure, maybe. But in the big scheme of things that doesn't matter. That doesn't change the cause of the shooting, the result or the long-term effects, so I'm not sure why it matters.
The idea of Homeland Security hiring random character actors to play family members of the deceased ... I just can't fathom that being something any branch of the government is capable of pulling off without major scandal and blowback. In a small town do you think that no one is going to say "Hey, I know Suzie's mom and that isn't her!" or something?
I'm all for distrusting the government and the media and the Illuminati (just kidding, I completely trust them), but I'm totally opposed to pointing at every little mystery or unexplained occurrence and immediately going all tin foil on it.
Never mistake "laziness and incompetence" for "grand conspiracy", especially if it involves the media.
As the old adage says: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Or "Cock-up before conspiracy."
