Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
The Roundtable / Re: More on the EV boondoggle
« Last post by Northwoods on Today at 08:38:48 PM »
It's been getting harder for average people to afford a vehicle for a long time. The small cheap cars are gone, the used starter cars aren't cheap, and nothing is repairable. It's been getting worse and worse for a long time long before BEVs came along. In fact one of the best things to boost car ownership would be to allow import of cheap cars including cheap BEVs. So I don't see bev as part of that puzzle

Cars are more expensive for a variety of reasons, mostly because the fed.gov has mandated increasing levels of emissions controls and "safety" technology. Plus, with CAFE standards tied to vehicle volume a larger car is better (for the OEM) but also makes it more expensive. Add in decades of cheap credit and a culture of asking "how much per month" instead of "how much" and we have the current mix of new cars on the market.

None of which has bugger all to do with the EV boondoggle.

BEV cars would, if sold at similar profit margins, cost double or more what comparable ICE cars sell for.  Factor in the power issues (which I notice you conveniently haven't addressed) and the average person cannot afford to live how they otherwise do now, and own and drive a suitable vehicle. Though as cordex notes, that may be a feature rather than a bug to your statist mindset.
2
The Roundtable / Re: More on the EV boondoggle
« Last post by cordex on Today at 07:55:40 PM »
As I said before, the goal is to make the average person unable to own a vehicle at all.  If you (zahc) can't see that you are willfully blind.
Given previous conversations, I’m fairly certain zahc sees that as a feature not a bug. People should live in a city, ride trains where they are allowed, and not own a vehicle.
3
The Roundtable / Re: More on the EV boondoggle
« Last post by zahc on Today at 07:50:34 PM »
No capacity factors needed there.  Going all BEV would consume at least half the annual electricity production in the USA, just to charge the batteries so our economy could continue to function.

There is no rationalizing use of off-peak hours or anything else that will get around the need to massively expand our electricity generating capacity to meet that level of demand increase.

The people in power that are pushing BEVs are simultaneously restricting power plant capacity expansion.

As I said before, the goal is to make the average person unable to own a vehicle at all.  If you (zahc) can't see that you are willfully blind.

It's been getting harder for average people to afford a vehicle for a long time. The small cheap cars are gone, the used starter cars aren't cheap, and nothing is repairable. It's been getting worse and worse for a long time long before BEVs came along. In fact one of the best things to boost car ownership would be to allow import of cheap cars including cheap BEVs. So I don't see bev as part of that puzzle
4
Politics / Re: Maybe we should just start a The World Has Gone Mad thread
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 07:27:04 PM »
One would think he will never get it but nowadays I wonder, just the mere fact he's eligible sicken me. I personally wonder why the heck is he even still breathing?

Canadian serial killer 'cannibal' who murdered at least 26 women and fed them to his pigs is now eligible to apply for PAROLE, outraging stricken relatives of his victims
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13120181/Canadian-Robert-Pickton-serial-killer-cannibal-parole.html

Don't have to worry about him anymore. Too bad there were no pigs to feed him to.

Robert Pickton is murdered in prison: Canadian serial killer confessed to killing 49 women whose remains he fed to his pigs
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13482515/Robert-Pickton-dies-prison-attack-Canadian-serial-killer.html
5
The Roundtable / Re: Titanic tourist sub goes missing
« Last post by HankB on Today at 07:21:14 PM »
If that were a glass of glycerin instead of water, there would be no reflections at the boundary.  They have the same refractive index  :)
Depends on what type of glass, refractive index of standard catalog optical glasses will run from about 1.45 to 1.9. It wouldn't be hard to find a reasonably close match to glycerine.
6
Politics / Re: The Trump Arrest Thread!
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 07:17:59 PM »
Well the left thinks Trump's appeal is screwed by this even before it's started

Quote
No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen
@NoLieWithBTC
New: Trump's appeal oral arguments will take place in front of the first all-Black women appellate bench.
https://x.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1796516256335753659

Does the Left Think Black Women are Biased? The Left Cheers All-Black Bench for Trump's Appeal
https://twitchy.com/chad-felix-greene/2024/05/31/does-the-left-think-black-women-are-biased-the-left-cheers-all-black-bench-for-trumps-appeal-n2396830
7
The Roundtable / Re: Titanic tourist sub goes missing
« Last post by zxcvbob on Today at 07:08:31 PM »

A "puree" marble in a glass of water... why, it's almost invisible exept for the studio lights reflecting off it!

     

:rofl:

Terry, 230RN

If that were a glass of glycerin instead of water, there would be no reflections at the boundary.  They have the same refractive index  :)
8
The Roundtable / Re: Titanic tourist sub goes missing
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 06:59:00 PM »
9
Politics / Re: The Trump Arrest Thread!
« Last post by WLJ on Today at 05:44:44 PM »
Don't question a questionable election
Don't question a questionable trial

Biden says questioning Trump’s guilty verdicts is ‘dangerous’ and ‘irresponsible’
https://www.wave3.com/2024/05/31/biden-says-questioning-trumps-guilty-verdicts-is-dangerous-irresponsible/
10
Politics / Re: The Trump Arrest Thread!
« Last post by Brad Johnson on Today at 05:41:07 PM »
When CNN's legal analyst says there's multiple serious problems with the prosecution's case, well... damn.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-legal-guru-says-new-york-trump-prosecutors-contorted-law-case-unjustified-mess

I can only hope his sentiment is prophetic

Quote
Honig said the case should be dubbed the "Frankenstein Case" because it was "cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator."

Brad
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10