I don't disagree with that philosophy, and it might be ideal. History has shown us however that at population level numbers, Humans don't work that way. Or at least not enough of them to make a workable society.
I believe I, among others, have touched on that "population density" issue several times and in several boards.
I recall years ago reading about rat experiments where despite having plenty of food and water, when the population got high enough, they'd start attacking each other.
I remember that triggering me into thinking about mold covering a ripe peach whenever I talked about population. Sooner or later the whole peach surface was covered.
Just an image, but it stuck with me.
I guess the problem is that with the total spectrum of human abilities and attitudes, there will always be some on the violent end of the spectrum. When there are too many in the total population, even though the ratio is the same, the violent ones begin intruding on the non-violent ones.
On a large scale, this is called "war."
This may be akin to the concept in epidemiology where only a few infected people aren't much of a danger, but as the number of infected people becomes greater, the "pathways" for the infection to spread become too numerous and
voila! you have an epidemic.
Soooo, when enough "violent" types are around numerically, they will start meeting with each other and form violent factions.
This can be called anything from "mostly peaceful"
riots demonstrations to miitary coups or revolutions or whatever.
Terry, 230RN