Author Topic: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss  (Read 3475 times)

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,935
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2014, 11:58:19 PM »
Oddly enough, I found my J-frame is less identifiable in my pants pocket than an auto of the same size.  It seems the cylinder breaks up the outline enough that it doesn't shout "gun."  It looks more like I've just got some junk in my pocket.  (This, with both guns naked, no "pocket holster.")
 
For coat pocket carry in cold weather, I carry the J-frame in my right pocket, but I had the same problem with it turning upside down that someone else mentioned.

So I made a prototype sleeve for it out of cardboard, as shown, and that worked like a charm.  I was going to cut the same thing out of leather, but stupid as it looks, after the first one wore out, I just made another one out of cardboard.  The second one is still going strong, and if I should have to fire from my pocket (G-d forbid), I won't be ruining a carefully hand-crafted leather sleeve, just the coat itself. 

So guess I'll just keep making "prototypes" out of cardboard.  Hell, they last at least a season's worth of cold weather before needing replacement, and it takes all of 15 minutes and a foot of duct tape, so....

Terry, 230RN

WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

BryanP

  • friendly hermit
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,808
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #26 on: February 26, 2014, 07:54:10 AM »
Where do you find jeans with that big of a watch pocket? I can barely fit my Spyderco Native in mine, and it's a hell of a lot smaller than just about any pistol.

My original jeans with the gigantic pockets have a suitably gigantic watch pocket too.  After holding one, I'm pretty sure I could put an LCP in those pants watch pocket without any of it sticking out. 
"Inaccurately attributed quotes are the bane of the internet" - Abraham Lincoln

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #27 on: February 26, 2014, 08:37:26 AM »
Huskey in what brand?

The huskey section, where clothes for the "big" boys were sold.  Apparently once you bump up the cutting pattern beyond a certain point all the ancillary parts (pockets, zippers, etc.) needed to be enlarged as well.

Why are you asking me?  I thought Jamis was our fashionista in this area.  Or is it Irwin?  One of those two.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,267
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #28 on: February 26, 2014, 10:32:51 AM »
If you're tall AND fat, good luck finding *anything* that fits.  But if you do, they generally have generous (but not reinforced) pockets.

I have some 44x36 and 46x36 khakis, same brand. (I think I put those numbers in the right order) It's amazingly difficult to find anything beyond 44x34, the length being the real limiter above about a 38 waist. 

My weight fluctuates between those sizes (trending down. Yay)  There's a big difference in the pockets and the cut of the "rise".
"It's good, though..."

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,935
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #29 on: February 27, 2014, 03:42:17 PM »
"I have some 44x36 and 46x36 khakis, same brand. (I think I put those numbers in the right order) "

Yeah, that's right.  The other way around, you couldn't even cast a shadow... at least not one which weighed very much.
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #30 on: February 27, 2014, 03:53:12 PM »
Just get some tailor made like LBJ!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3GT9UN7nDo
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

mtnbkr

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,388
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #31 on: February 27, 2014, 05:58:48 PM »
"I have some 44x36 and 46x36 khakis, same brand. (I think I put those numbers in the right order) "

Yeah, that's right.  The other way around, you couldn't even cast a shadow... at least not one which weighed very much.

My B-I-L is 32x36.  He was 30x36 at one point.  Dude's 6'6" and 140lbs (I think).  Eats whatever he wants and stays rail thin.  We thought the wife, then the baby would put some weight on him, but it didn't.  ;/

Chris

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #32 on: February 27, 2014, 06:06:31 PM »
I wear 32x34 at 60 years old  :P
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Matthew Carberry

  • Formerly carebear
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,281
  • Fiat justitia, pereat mundus
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #33 on: February 27, 2014, 06:52:17 PM »
My B-I-L is 32x36.  He was 30x36 at one point.  Dude's 6'6" and 140lbs (I think).  Eats whatever he wants and stays rail thin.  We thought the wife, then the baby would put some weight on him, but it didn't.  ;/

Chris

Maybe he could try eating them?  =D
"Not all unwise laws are unconstitutional laws, even where constitutional rights are potentially involved." - Eugene Volokh

"As for affecting your movement, your Rascal should be able to achieve the the same speeds no matter what holster rig you are wearing."

mtnbkr

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,388
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2014, 09:24:30 PM »

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,935
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2014, 09:44:11 PM »
I wear 32x34 at 60 years old  :P

Uhhhh, so that's what, 1088 at 60 years old?
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

coppertales

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 947
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #36 on: March 02, 2014, 12:18:13 PM »
Get a pair of Carhart suspenders.  Most of the other brands are junk.  Been wearing them for years....chris3

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #37 on: March 02, 2014, 05:19:42 PM »
Or Duluth Trading's Sidewinders - look like you are wearing a shoulder holster even if you are not.

But for absolute hold-upness I lurvs Perry suspenders that hook under your belt instead of making ragged holes in the pants fabric.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

Chuck Dye

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,560
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #38 on: March 02, 2014, 07:47:19 PM »
I have stopped buying Cabela's Huntsman Chinos since they more than halved the width of the front pockets.  The replacements, Cabela's Aged Khakis, have pockets that are almost too big:  more than enough room for either my full sized or compact 1911, 'though they print furiously when I sit.

My weight loss woe in the CCW department is the droopy drawers effect as my butt plays less and less a part in supporting the weight of the (IWB) gun.  The question of the moment is whether to punch yet another hole in the old belt or break down and buy a new one.
Gee, I'd love to see your data!

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Pocket Carry vs Weight Loss
« Reply #39 on: March 03, 2014, 12:34:21 AM »
Punch.  You can always trim the free end when it starts going too far around.  Then edge dressing.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.