Author Topic: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...  (Read 18754 times)

Bigjake

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,024
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #50 on: December 23, 2007, 04:46:25 AM »
I'm ordering a couple few shipping containers of edison bulbs, anybody want in?  volume discount...

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #51 on: December 23, 2007, 06:00:16 AM »
Quote
There are LOTS of things that you can use

Like flipping off the breaker and locking the box  police
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,483
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #52 on: December 23, 2007, 07:53:13 AM »
There are LOTS of things that you can use


A belt, hairbrush, ruler...   cheesy
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #53 on: December 23, 2007, 06:14:06 PM »
I understand that they're not really banned, they just have to meet the efficiency requirements by 2012-2014. 

I wouldn't let that get in the way of the Second Boston Tea Party, though.  We need heroes for the yet-to-be-announced Uprising and Revolution, don'tcha know?   rolleyes
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

SomeKid

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #54 on: December 23, 2007, 08:43:20 PM »
If someone wanted to buy LED lights, even if they had the odd color, where would you get them?

Rocketman56

  • New Member
  • Posts: 63
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #55 on: December 23, 2007, 09:46:46 PM »
Somekid:
Quote
If someone wanted to buy LED lights, even if they had the odd color, where would you get them?

My short list.. I'm sure there's more..

                 http://www.betterlifegoods.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=1
                 http://www.metaefficient.com/lighting/ecoleds-mercury-free-led-bulbs.html
                 http://www.optosun.com/products.asp
                 http://www.ccrane.com/lights/led-light-bulbs/index.aspx
                 http://theledlight.com/led-light-bulbs.html
                 http://www.earthtechproducts.com/energy-saving-led-light-bulbs.html
                 http://www.x-tremegeek.com/templates/searchdetail.asp?productID=11880&ta=detail_img&pi=Y&st=3
                 http://www.lc-led.com/ledlightbulbs.html
                 http://www.environmentallights.com/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1003&gclid=CK6CnKL0uZACFQUalgodnGVwLg
                 http://www.superbrightleds.com/led_prods.htm
                 http://www.cyberguys.com/templates/SearchProducts.asp?categoryID=572
                 http://www.ledlight.com/LZHousehold.aspx


Some are manufacturers, most are retailers..


Edited: forgot the list!! rolleyes
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.
Robert A. Heinlein

Ad astra per aspera
"through the thorns to the stars"

SomeKid

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #56 on: December 23, 2007, 11:46:22 PM »
Rocket,

Thanks for the links. I admit, I only checked a few, but is there a reason those LED lights are all hanging around 30 bucks, on the low side?

Rocketman56

  • New Member
  • Posts: 63
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #57 on: December 24, 2007, 06:40:42 AM »
Supply and Demand would be my guess..

Lot of R&D still being paid for..  some of the SuperBrights are pretty recent (within the last year)..

Give them a year or two, and I'll imagine things will change.. I don't think CFL's will last much
past 2020, as LEDs really hit their stride..

Steve
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.
Robert A. Heinlein

Ad astra per aspera
"through the thorns to the stars"

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #58 on: December 24, 2007, 07:23:25 AM »
As my father said many years ago....

"They're going to legislate us to Heaven, whether we want to go or not."

Anyone notice the balckmarket for regular flow toilets sprung up since they mandated the "Two flush" low-flo toilets Huh?   

There's a black market for toilets?

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #59 on: December 24, 2007, 07:26:23 AM »
They're working on LED bulbs with a phosphor coating that causes them to have warm light. Until then, the white ones tend to have the harsh bluewhite glare of a LED flashlight. Unless you want your house to look like Minority Report, I'd wait.



This is why you look at the temperature and color rendering index on lights.  There are several manufacturers that produce CFL's that give off natural sunlight.  GE, sylvania and philips to name a few.  Avoid the cheap no-name companies.  A temp index of 6,500K is equivalent to regular lightbulbs and 11,000K is nearing sunlight.  Both can be found at any major hardware store.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #60 on: December 24, 2007, 07:30:01 AM »
Quote
There's a black market for toilets?

Well, it's more of a brown market, actually Wink
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

nico

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 678
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #61 on: December 24, 2007, 08:06:06 PM »
fwiw, CFLs give off much higher levels of UVB rays than incandescent bulbs, which is bad for people with diseases that cause photosensitivity.  My mom, who has lupus, was really thrilled to hear about this law rolleyes

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #62 on: December 25, 2007, 05:31:17 AM »
Quote
Under the measure, all light bulbs must use 25% to 30% less energy than today's products by 2012 to 2014. The phase-in will start with 100-watt bulbs in 2012 and end with 40-watt bulbs in 2014. By 2020, bulbs must be 70% more efficient.

U.S. energy bill nearing passage boosts efficient lighting

While not a defacto ban, I doubt the incandescent bulb can be made 70% more efficient.
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,540
  • I Am Inimical
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #63 on: December 25, 2007, 08:15:21 AM »
Hum...

That 70% more efficient rating by 2020 may very well kill the Halogen bulb market...
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #64 on: December 25, 2007, 09:58:07 AM »
Quote
While not a defacto ban, I doubt the incandescent bulb can be made 70% more efficient.

Such weeping and gnashing of teeth.

The feds enacted improved vehicle mileage rules, too.  Waiting for the call to arms over that one, myself.  rolleyes
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

Desertdog

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,360
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #65 on: December 25, 2007, 10:12:40 AM »
Quote
The feds enacted improved vehicle mileage rules, too.  Waiting for the call to arms over that one, myself.
There will probably be a great increase in rebuilding the older cars.

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #66 on: December 25, 2007, 10:54:37 AM »
True, but I find the whole thing darned near hilarious if it wasn't so sad.  I kid you not, people are calling for deaths of legislators, Alamo-type last stands over caches of hoarded incandescent light bulbs, 21st-century replays of the Boston Tea Party, you name it.

Where were they when we suffered the horrible legislation of asbestos, leaded gasoline, radium dinner plates, mercury thermometers, seat belts and child-proof containers?  Them's grounds for insurrection, I say!   rolleyes
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,540
  • I Am Inimical
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #67 on: December 25, 2007, 01:03:47 PM »
The only one that have gotten me really pissed are the ones dealing with cooking of food.

It can be very hard to find a medium rare hamburger in some areas because food guidelines call for turning the burger into a damned hockey puck.

Or, the way New Jersey tried to legislate a few years ago that no restaurant could serve eggs that had runny yolks. Hard scrambled, or worse.

Holy crap, just print a warning on the menu and let me take my frigging chances!
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #68 on: December 25, 2007, 03:57:03 PM »
Quote
While not a defacto ban, I doubt the incandescent bulb can be made 70% more efficient.

Such weeping and gnashing of teeth.

The feds enacted improved vehicle mileage rules, too.  Waiting for the call to arms over that one, myself.  rolleyes

Who's weeping and gnashing? Call to arms? rolleyes
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #69 on: December 25, 2007, 04:59:46 PM »
Quote from: wacki
There's a black market for toilets?

Yep, you can get big bucks for your old 3.5 gal/flush......Or you can smuggle them in from Canada....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12590982  is the first one I came accross when I googled "Toilet Smuggling"
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #70 on: December 25, 2007, 06:25:59 PM »
It's not just here on APS, Scout.  I've seen it on two additional forums, as well.  One even called for the death of legislators who enacted the bill.  undecided
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #71 on: December 25, 2007, 06:36:28 PM »
They can have my 3.5gal flush toilet when they pry it out of my cold, dead,...

G98:

I am not at all happy with the "Energy" bill that does nothing to produce more energy or reduce its cost.  Damnfool CAFE requirements are but one reason to veto the abortion.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

GigaBuist

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,345
    • http://www.justinbuist.org/blog/
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #72 on: December 25, 2007, 07:26:59 PM »
...they didn't actually ban them.  They just set efficiency requirements.
Is this really the case?  I ask because lumen measurements are highly subjective.  Could the manufacturers simply revise their measurement system so that the measurements read high enough to satisfy the law, without actually changing their bubls any?

I'm not sure if they could just revise the measurements.  I haven't hit the section of law (if there is one) that gives a government qualified rating method.

However, here's summary of efficiency requirements for anybody interested:

On 1/1/2012:  72 watt bulbs must produce 1490 - 2600 lumens.
On 1/1/2013:  53 watt bulbs must produce 1050 - 1489 lumens.
On 1/1/2014:  43 watt bulbs must produce 750 - 1049 lumens.  Also, 29 watt bulbs must prouduce 310 - 749 lumens.

As far as this being the death of halogens:  I looked up the lumen output on the 50W bulbs I just bought the other week and they rate at 550 lumens.  That's just shy of half what they'd have to kick out come 01/01/2013, so unless I'm buying crappy halogens (Sylvania, cost $8 a pop) I'd say they're right out too.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #73 on: December 25, 2007, 07:39:37 PM »
G98,

Some of the links I found from my search point to Treehugger.com (yep, it really does exist), had everyone there up in arms about low-flow toilets and how to get 3.5 gal ones from Canada.

Although someone was talking about building their own sawdust toilet.  I could only just picture a giant litter box.    shocked
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

alex_trebek

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 462
Re: US Congress bans Incandescent bulbs by 2014...
« Reply #74 on: December 27, 2007, 05:15:37 AM »
Nice, great work congress.  Can we get back to fixing the economy now???  How about cancer research?  How about anything that is a real problem?