We have a Tecumseh, Geronimo2 and now a Geronimo45. They all spout similar nonsense, mostly Paulian.
I do know that faux Native American stuff made in China seems to sell well to white-guilt sorts, though.
Problem is: Paulians don't subscribe to "white-guilt." Paulians tend to be Rand-oriented Objectivists and reject the idea that they have to bear anyone's guilt but their own. I don't know any of the 3 listed monickers or remember any theme to their posts, but it seems a bit silly to throw the Paulian label at them if they supposedly subscribe to the white-guilt mentality.
Well, you took 2 separate lines, from 2 separate posts, from 2 separate posters and came up with "Paulians subscribing to white guilt". What is that, new math?
Says AZRedhawk44, whose monicker comes from his state of residence, favorite firearm and caliber and has nothing to do with red-tailed hawks of New Mexico nor the top speed of a pinto hatchback.
Kinda figured that was what it meant since I never thought it had anything to do with injuns and I've never heard of a 44 caliber bird.
I don't think anyone singled you out so you don't need to apologize for your name.
Yes, because no one buys 'Indian' stuff because they find it interesting, or because they're one of the 80% of Americans who claim to be 1/8 Cherokee, or just like the look, or because it's like all the other tick-tack tourist crap they buy... has to be an expression of their horrible, horrible guilt at the 16th-19th century.
Do you live in constant suspicion of lib'rul bogeymen?
Man, you do run in front of the target and scream persecution, don't you...
No kidding.
I'm surprised he didn't start an argument about the definition of the word "Indian", but then, the thread is young.
Yes wood, I saw the apostrophesPosted by a guy who goes by Sergeant Bob, cuz his name is Bob, and he's a retired Master Sergeant.