There aren't many places he could have said that and not been booed off the stage.
Oh, there are
tons of places where he would be lauded: they're all in Europe, where the dollar is getting killed.
That said,
he had a point.The folks he refers to are the remnants of Natural Selection. If they could actively compete, they wouldn't require their described binkies. If they CAN compete, they are not threatened by such observations.
Natural selection? Do tell.
Suppose a major natural disaster or terrorist attack hit the US and completely knocked out infrastructure, no food trucks, no power, no anything for a long time.
Who would be surviving, in SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST?
The San Francisco liberals who think food comes from whichever is the trendiest restaurant of the week, who don't have any food storage, no guns, no survival skills at all?
Or the Pennsylvania small-town people with their guns and religion, a sense of community and self-reliance, who can adapt to hardship?
Well?
That's the problem with elitist liberals. They have a skewed sense of reality, and never realize that when it comes to things that actually matter in the most basic sense, like basic survival skills, self-reliance, adaptability to hardship and the ability to obtain food or protect others, they're completely and utterly useless.
In times when civilization breaks, if you can heal the sick or treat injury, grow food, shoot a gun, catch fish, hunt, dress game, build or repair things with your hands and basic tools, cook or bake, build with wood, weld, fix a vehicle, or make things with chemicals, even know how to identify plants or build a water distiller, you are useful.
I've met a lot of elitist liberals who have none of those skills, nor the mental adaptability to do anything but their meaningless "academic" or "art" tasks, everything else comes from someone else. And they would be nothing but useless baggage in any group of survivors.
I wonder if they'll ever realize that.