Dtemplar, as a favor to you and your two weeks' worth of time on this forum, let's recap, shall we?
Lest we forget, this thread is about the B-2 Spirit that crashed, with the two-man crew ejecting mere seconds before it made a big burning hole in the ground.
By design, the B-2 requires computerized flight control augmentation to keep the pointy end forward and the bomb bay doors on the bottom side.
It's not a Piper Cub, it's not an Ercoupe, it's not a B-52H, nor is it a YB-47 prototype - all of which are/were aerodynamically stable. The injection of the XB-35 and YB-37 into the thread served a purpose of which I'm not sure.
My on-topic response was to the subject of the thread (B-2, hint, hint), stating that the airframe in question required the extra help of computers. When those onboard stability computers go bye-bye, you pull the ejection seat handles, because you will have left controlled flight at that very moment. It doesn't get any simpler than that, really.
If you want to create an argument where none exists, I suggest you try a different thread or forum, because you're reading too much into this one. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for a little while longer, but between this thread and the airgun thread, some eyebrows are indeed being raised.