Author Topic: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting  (Read 56057 times)

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #200 on: November 09, 2009, 09:29:46 PM »
Obama's religion isn't Islam.....it's political power.....  >:D


One thing about the 5.7....it did as well as any non-magnum sevice round in damage done....and it's made me reconsider the 5.7 from a short-barrel pistol like the Five-seveN.....too bad no one else chambers it....

Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

Silver Bullet

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,859
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #201 on: November 09, 2009, 11:17:28 PM »
I can't find the link now, but earlier today I read on the news that the shooter's lawyer is asking authorities to not question his client.  Further, he doubts his client can get a fair trial.

What exactly is he suggesting here ?  That because the lawyer doesn't believe his client should get a fair trial, that the government should just let him walk ?  After killing more than a dozen people ?    :mad:

Tomorrow I expect to read where the lawyer is demanding an Honorable Discharge for his client.  Wednesday, he'll be demanding full retirement benefits.  Thursday, compensation for the way his client was shot in self-defense without being tried first.  Friday, compensation for the news using his client's name and image without his permission.   ;/


Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,355
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #202 on: November 09, 2009, 11:22:46 PM »
I can't find the link now, but earlier today I read on the news that the shooter's lawyer is asking authorities to not question his client.  Further, he doubts his client can get a fair trial.

Too many attorneys have come to confuse the right to a fair trial with the "right" to be guaranteed an acquittal. In this guy's case, despite the media insistence on referring to him as the "suspect," there is no question that he did the deed. His motive(s) may not be known and may never be known, but they don't really matter. He did the deed. There really is no exculpatory evidence that can be offered, so a trial is essentially a formality. He was in uniform, shooting military personnel on a military base. He's going before a military court, and I think they can produce a courts martial panel that's sufficiently objective to play by the rules.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 04:06:53 PM by Hawkmoon »
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #203 on: November 10, 2009, 01:06:31 AM »
Let's hope he bucks the trend and actually receives a carried out death sentence from the .mil.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

RocketMan

  • Mad Rocket Scientist
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,675
  • Semper Fidelis
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #204 on: November 10, 2009, 07:39:29 AM »
Let's hope he bucks the trend and actually receives a carried out death sentence from the .mil.

I am in agreement with this sentiment.  It's been 48 years since the last military execution, IIRC.  Quite a trend to buck.
If there really was intelligent life on other planets, we'd be sending them foreign aid.

Conservatives see George Orwell's "1984" as a cautionary tale.  Progressives view it as a "how to" manual.

My wife often says to me, "You are evil and must be destroyed." She may be right.

Liberals believe one should never let reason, logic and facts get in the way of a good emotional argument.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,022
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #205 on: November 10, 2009, 09:00:20 AM »
I can't find the link now, but earlier today I read on the news that the shooter's lawyer is asking authorities to not question his client.  Further, he doubts his client can get a fair trial.

What exactly is he suggesting here ?  That because the lawyer doesn't believe his client should get a fair trial, that the government should just let him walk ?  After killing more than a dozen people ?    :mad:

What the defense lawyer is suggesting is that his client cannot get a fair trial if the trial were to be held at Ft. Hood.  This is because of the wide publicity and the large number of persons impacted by the shooting could make finding an impartial jury in that area difficult.  Because of this, the trial will very likely be moved to another, more distant, jurisdiction. 

The same concept applies to civilian trials.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

SADShooter

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,242
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #206 on: November 10, 2009, 10:35:14 AM »
Has the round Hasan was stopped with been reported?
"Ah, is there any wine so sweet and intoxicating as the tears of a hippie?"-Tamara, View From the Porch

makattak

  • Dark Lord of the Cis
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,022
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #207 on: November 10, 2009, 10:49:39 AM »
Has the round Hasan was stopped with been reported?

No. However, a bit of investigative work:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/11/06/2009-11-06_police_sgt_kimberly_munley_credited_with_ending_fort_hood_gunman_maj_nidal_malik.html

She's a civilian cop employed by Ft. Hood. The picture in that article looks like she has a Beretta 92 on her hip.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/fort-hood-hero-sgt-kimberly-munleys-asked-died/story?id=9022438

Statements about her partner say "his Beretta" which leads me to believe that, as they are employed by the army, they likely are issued Beretta 92's.

My guess is 9mm.
I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.

So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you also were meant to have it. And that is an encouraging thought

Silver Bullet

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,859
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #208 on: November 10, 2009, 10:51:00 AM »
What the defense lawyer is suggesting is that his client cannot get a fair trial if the trial were to be held at Ft. Hood.  This is because of the wide publicity and the large number of persons impacted by the shooting could make finding an impartial jury in that area difficult.  Because of this, the trial will very likely be moved to another, more distant, jurisdiction. 

The same concept applies to civilian trials.

I'm sure you're correct. 

I was a bit peeved reading the lawyer's fair trial remark right after reading the lawyer didn't want authorities questioning his client.  The article I read didn't quote the lawyer as stating his client couldn't get a fair trial in the military.  The wording suggested to me he thought his client couldn't get a fair trial anywhere in America.

SADShooter

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,242
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #209 on: November 10, 2009, 11:57:01 AM »
Thanks, makattak!

I suppose it could be a 96, but you're probably right with the 92.

I was surprised and disappointed that 4 rounds didn't end him.
"Ah, is there any wine so sweet and intoxicating as the tears of a hippie?"-Tamara, View From the Porch

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #210 on: November 10, 2009, 12:27:06 PM »
Do we know where those 4 rouns hit him?

40 caliber

  • Sic Semper Tyrannis
  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 277
    • Will to Exist
No self-defense for soldiers
« Reply #211 on: November 10, 2009, 04:25:42 PM »
Quote
If you want to kill as many American soldiers as possible just attack them outside a “combat zone.”  As a soldier and former marine, I’ve thought about this issue for many years because I am effectively deprived of my right to self-defense about 98% percent of the time I am in uniform.
http://willtoexist.com/easy-kill-american-soldiers_2415/
It's collapsing all around you.

crt360

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,206
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #212 on: November 10, 2009, 04:43:51 PM »
I suppose it could be a 96, but you're probably right with the 92.

I was surprised and disappointed that 4 rounds didn't end him.

From what I read or saw on the local news, it was a 9mm.  I think it probably would have ended him had he not received immediate medical attention.  Keep in mind that he was the last one shot, initially thought to have been one of the victims by the first responders, treated as such, and then quickly transported over to Scott & White hospital with the other seriously wounded.

Not to sound morbid, and maybe more facts will come out that completely change my opinion, but the results of the 5.7 didn't put it on my short list of defensive handguns.  With what was reported as well over 100 rounds fired at unarmed folks, at close range, in confined areas, the guy shot approximately 44 people, multiple times for some if not most, of which 13 died, and 31 were wounded.  Of those wounded, as of yesterday, 27 had already been treated and released.  Some of those shot said they were not even initially aware they had been hit.
For entertainment purposes only.

SADShooter

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,242
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #213 on: November 10, 2009, 05:05:24 PM »
I initially heard they were all COM/torso, but I haven't seen verification. 5.7 seems like a niche cartridge with some value using SS190 in the P90, but the FiveSeveN (?) pistol with ball doesn't seem like a great defensive (offensive =() choice.
"Ah, is there any wine so sweet and intoxicating as the tears of a hippie?"-Tamara, View From the Porch

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,500
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #214 on: November 10, 2009, 05:09:50 PM »
Maybe I'm all wrong, but the discussion of 5.7 terminal ballistics seems very out of place in this thread.   =(
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

crt360

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,206
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #215 on: November 10, 2009, 05:53:17 PM »
Maybe I'm all wrong, but the discussion of 5.7 terminal ballistics seems very out of place in this thread.   =(

Sorry, fistful, I don't know what to say.  At first, I thought the same thing.  I even deleted my initial response before retyping it.  Then I decided, if this thread is called "Fort Hood, TX: Shooting", maybe this is the place to comment on it.  We've already talked about everything else, from the shooter's religious beliefs to members' dissatisfaction with the President's public statements on the issue.  As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I actually drove to the hospital where victims were being treated on the afternoon of the shooting to donate blood.  I'm not trying to callously derail a memorial thread with my response about the shooter's weapon of choice, but if others would like it removed or relocated, that's fine with me.
For entertainment purposes only.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,500
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #216 on: November 10, 2009, 06:17:27 PM »
Good job on the blood donation.  I don't think anyone's trying to be unfeeling, or anything.  I just think some of those comments could be saved for another thread. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: No self-defense for soldiers
« Reply #217 on: November 10, 2009, 06:35:50 PM »
http://willtoexist.com/easy-kill-american-soldiers_2415/

Crazy talk^^^, I say! 

Same little bit of crazy with this:
http://www.star-telegram.com/local/story/1743437.html

Ka-ray-zee! No WAY could we actually train military folks to use and carry arms.  Just unrealistic to expect commanders to complete such a task, which would obviously interfere with more important tasks like...and...and...

Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

SADShooter

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,242
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #218 on: November 10, 2009, 08:54:52 PM »
fistful:

I'm processing information, which is part of my (unconscious?) means of dealing with an array of strong feelings on this topic. My intent certainly was not to diminish anyone else's grief or to seem crass. Like crt360, I'll encourage the mods to edit as they deem appropriate.                 
"Ah, is there any wine so sweet and intoxicating as the tears of a hippie?"-Tamara, View From the Porch

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #219 on: November 10, 2009, 09:26:00 PM »
Maybe I'm all wrong, but the discussion of 5.7 terminal ballistics seems very out of place in this thread.   =(
Mostly it's a wishin' he was dead kinda thing.  As in, why is there no justice, why does he survive getting shot but the 12 victims don't?

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,355
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #220 on: November 10, 2009, 11:18:04 PM »
Mostly it's a wishin' he was dead kinda thing.  As in, why is there no justice, why does he survive getting shot but the 12 victims don't?

Hopefully, so he doesn't get to be regarded by other Islamicist nutjobs as a martyr/hero. IMHO it would have been manifestly unjust if he had succeeded in martyring himself by going out in a blaze of [Islamicist] glory. I'm much happier thinking he's alive and paralyzed. I suppose that makes me a bad person and a bad Christian, but ... I'll survive.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,500
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #221 on: November 10, 2009, 11:26:29 PM »
Bad, bad, bad Christian!

I shall add a  :angel:, just to avoid confusion.   :police:
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 12:44:08 AM by fistful »
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,273
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #222 on: August 04, 2013, 05:13:28 PM »
Hopefully, so he doesn't get to be regarded by other Islamicist nutjobs as a martyr/hero. IMHO it would have been manifestly unjust if he had succeeded in martyring himself by going out in a blaze of [Islamicist] glory. I'm much happier thinking he's alive and paralyzed. I suppose that makes me a bad person and a bad Christian, but ... I'll survive.

Major D'bag's trial is coming up quick.  Does anybody else think seeking the death penalty is a bad idea? (even if justified)  Could they sentence him to something like 20 years of hard labor for each victim, sentences to be served sequentially?  It would reduce the chance of his conviction being overturned on appeal, and it denies him the chance to be a martyr.

Lock 'im up for the rest of his life, and then some.  He doesn't even get out to be buried until his full sentence is up. :mad:
« Last Edit: August 04, 2013, 05:22:14 PM by zxcvbob »
"It's good, though..."

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #223 on: August 04, 2013, 05:17:10 PM »
It's funny how we can drone-kill people without a trial, but this for certain guilty terrorist will get twenty years of apppeals  ;/
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Fort Hood, TX: Shooting
« Reply #224 on: August 04, 2013, 06:11:04 PM »
For a workplace violence incident there sure is a lot of concern about this guy becoming a religious martyr.

And I'm going to throw another bucket of gasoline on that fire by saying The Government ought to take all steps possible to avoid him becoming some sort of martry - going so far as to do weekly press releases of him making little rocks out of big rocks.  The Government ought to make it as easy as possible for supporters/worshipers/followers to visit him - even to the point of setting up a shuttle bus service and pre-inspection before arriving at the prison.  I am sure The Government can, for the shuttle run, get ahold of a Blue Bird school bus that meets all current federal safety regulations.  This plan does not add to the federal deficit by way of pension liabilities, as they can hire part-time TSA agents to do the security checks before anybody was allowed on the bus.

"I'm sorry, but your water bottle is 1/2-fluid ounce over the allowable size.  However, you will be glad to hear that we found nothing wrong with your travel size bottle of nitroglycerine.  Have a nice trip.  Your bottle of ricin seemed to be leaking, so we put it in a baggie for you."

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.