Well, now I'm bored.
If whatsisname is going to claim that children do not have basic human rights simply because "[they] don't," then it seems reasonable to point out that others have stated that blacks and women do not have basic human rights simply because they don't.
The argument implicit in that statement is only effective at all if whatsisname rejects the idea that blacks and women, indeed classes of people at all, do not have basic human rights simply because "they don't."
That's logic, that's what that is.
It's also virtually identical to the argument put forth by people who are anti-abortion, a group of people that I believe includes whatsisname.
Also, who said anything about nazis, other than whatsisname? Is no one aware of anyone other than nazis who have denied human rights to people simply by their inclusion in a marginalized group?
Of course, if you're going to read attacks in anything I say, there isn't a whole lot I can do about it, other than get bored, I guess. It's getting old.