Would you say that Jessie Jackson, Faith Daniels, there are more I just can find the list, should not of lived? They were the product of a rape.
Are you saying Jessie Jackson (who was the product of statutory rape, not rape rape, as far as I know) and Faith Daniels are more deserving of life than anyone else? That is an incoherent argument, because nobody knows who an embryo or fetus will turn out to be.
I do not see that much of a difference between telling a woman she cannot abort at an early stage (based on the concept that "life begins at conception"), and telling a woman she must have sex and get pregnant.
If the concern is that an unborn child might has a right to life, what difference does it make whether that unborn child is a fetus, an embryo, or an egg and a sperm? If you're fine with taking away a woman's choice to have an abortion, I don't see why you're not fine with taking away everyone's right not to procreate. Think about all the great and wonderful people who are not being born because most people in society exercise too much restraint and/or use birth control? Aren't there lives more important than the right of people to choose whether or not to have sex?