I can see your analogy, but I think it lacking on one point of fact and several of interpretation/analysis.
Point of fact:
Anthropogenic Global Warming has never been proved to occur, whereas Argentinian/ruinous(1) inflation caused by gov't action has many examples we can study. Heck, the process by which AGW occurs has yet to be well-described. It might be a hypothesis and is certainly not a tested theorem. OTOH, we know some things which will trigger ruinous inflation.
Points of interp/analysis:
I don't have time to go into them. One thing, though...any economic system that rests on confidence, fiat, faith, etc. will be subject to wild fluctuation once the faith in it begins to crumble wholesale. People talk about how all the printed money in the last 18months is no biggie, as it may be just being sat on by lenders. This may be so, though I remain unconvinced. Assuming it is correct, under what circumstances could lenders let loose all that cash, willingly or otherwise and flood the money supply, making the "sitting on the cash, no worries" argument moot?
(1) I write "ruinous," as the differences between inflation, high inflation, and hyperinflation are a bit arbitrary.