I didn't say that anyone is being denied access to anything. I simply think that chanting "(insert cause here) is not a right because it isn't in the bill of rights" as a reason to reject any attempt (whether genuine or superfical) to fix the healthcare (insert other cause) problem contributes nothing, and isn't valid.
I used gasoline as an example because it is generally considered almost perfectly inelastic in the short run.
One can pick several other examples, how about access to purchase clean water?
The bottom line is there are plenty of better reasons to find fault in both the HCR law and industry. People are not entitled to stuff that isn't free to produce (like atmospheric air).
That does mean they don't have a right to have access to purchase whatever they want.
I don't have a right to gasoline. It is a commodity to be bought and sold. Just like health cafe. Someone had to make that gasoline. Someone had to get educated to provide medical care. Your arguement doesn't hold water. It's akin to; you have to register your car, why not your firearm.
I didn't say anyone had a right to it, just the right to access to it (assuming lawful intentions). If you were denied the oportunity to utilize (buy) any form of fuel based on the whim of a politician or other group of people, I suspect you would be upset. Especially if you were singled out from everyone else based on something besides an ability to pay.
In other words, if you were denied the ability to purchase natural gas, electricity, clean water, whatever G&S because "the constitution doesn't recognize your right to clean water." you would probably be upset, as would anyone.