Fine, I used some snark to push my point and I should avoid that. HTG is asserting that the motivation for FOX pulling Hannity away was pure money, and that is what I said, albeit with some sarcasm.
However, I am listing multiple sources for my interpretation of events. The problem I have is that you, collectively, are saying I am wrong without actually giving any evidence for why I am wrong, besides saying I'm partisian or my quoted sources are partisian. That isn't good enough. I'll admit I'm wrong, but you need to show me why. Is media matters flat our lying? Is the society of professional journalists flat out lying? Can you show me they are lying? You can chant about how they are partisian all day long, but it doesn't mean they are wrong.
If you want to disagree with me, then show me why my sources are factually incorrect so I can revise my opinions.
@headless: Don't act insulted, show me why I'm wrong. And I apologize if you mistook my sarcasm for a mis-interpretation, but honestly, I still think my post is an accurate summary of the debate.
-----
At this point though I don't see what else anyone could say. The msm has dropped the story so I doubt there will be any other information released.