Fistful, De Selby is asking for facts that are I believe unavailable to dispute Krauthammer's opinion.
He's asking for these facts as he's been challenged on his assertion as fact that Ghadaffi (sp?), Mubarek, etc are being overthrown because they didn't oppose the Iraq war.
I've never said that the upheaval in these countries was due to the success of the Iraq war, but I've questioned whether there could be a conneciton. That's considerably different than making blanket statements, as De Selby has and always does, and then demanding that others produce evidence to disprove those blanket statements, which De Selby is doing now and has done before.
In another thread, De Selby made the blanket assertion that Iraq was poorer and had slower economic growth since the beginning of the Iraq war. He used as his basis a blog written by an anonymous blogger. I produced information from the CIA which countered the facts from his anonymous blogger.
At some point I think it should be up to De Selby to do some legwork, instead of making bold statements and then making others do the research to disprove them.