Ok then Iran.
Alrighty then, lets see what I can cook up with my aging knowledge.
Warfare Doctrine: Primarily classified as maneuver but still heavily reliant on attrition.
Army
Threat against continental U.S.: Non-existent, lacking suitable long range deployment options (amphibious/air delivery)
Threat against local region: Vs. local regional forces, credible. Vs. visiting foreign forces, possible but limited.
Air force
Threat against continental U.S.: Non-existent, lacking suitable long range air-refueling and forward air field options.
Threat against local region: Vs. local regional forces, credible to limited depending on country. Vs. visiting foreign forces, limited to non-existent.
Navy
Threat against continental U.S.: Non-existent, lacking suitable long-range blue water vessels and forward port locations/underway replenishment.
Threat against sea targets in local region: Vs. unarmed civilian watercraft, credible. Vs. surface warships of regional powers, credible. Vs. surface warships of the U.S. and other major industrialized nations, possible but limited. Vs. modern submarines of the U.S. and other major industrialized nations, limited to non-existent.
Threat against land targets in local region: Shore targets, credible. In-land targets, very limited.
Strategic Rocket Force
Threat against continental U.S.: Non-existent, lacking suitable long-range delivery systems.
Threat against local region: Vs. local regional forces, credible to limited depending on target AA/ABM capabilities. Vs. visiting foreign forces, credible to limited depending on target AA/ABM capability. Payload capabilities: Confirmed conventional and chemical, unconfirmed nuclear. Assessment is for capability only and ignores strategic weapon deterrence policies.
Intelligence Dept
Threat against continental U.S.: Intelligence collection, credible. Covert operations, limited. Guerrilla warfare support, limited to non-existent.
Threat against local region: Intelligence collection, credible. Covert operations, credible. Guerrilla warfare support, credible.
Overall assessment:
Direct military operations threat against the United States - None.
Direct intelligence operations threat against the United States - Limited.
Direct military operations threat against regional powers - Credible.
Direct intelligence operations threat against regional powers - Credible.
Direct military operations threat against visiting foreign powers - Possible but Limited.
Direct intelligence operations threat against visiting foreign powers - Credible.
But this is just my personal 5-minute assessment, I'm sure there is an NIE floating around somewhere far more detailed and with possibly different conclusions.