See the below article. For both our UK and US folks in the know -- is it actually "policy" to follow the route computed by your vehicle's nav system when responding to a call? I recognize that the events here are way over the top, but I can certainly see where a nav system route could delay responses by 5-10 minutes on a fairly regular basis.
I have a car GPS and I love it, but I certainly know it's limitations. It's great for getting me exactly to places that I am unfamiliar with. I know though, from experience in places I AM familiar with, that it almost never takes me by the fastest "local knowledge" route, even when I have it set for "fastest route." If this story is accurate, I wonder if there's something having to do with insurance, lawsuits, etc. that would keep an emergency vehicle driver from "overriding" the decision of his nav system?
---------------------------
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17083173%26method=full%26siteid=66633%26headline=satnav%2dordeal%2dof%2dambulance%2dgirl%2d%2d10-name_page.html16 May 2006
SATNAV ORDEAL OF AMBULANCE GIRL, 10
Crew took 2 hours for 10-min journey
By Karen Bale
AN AMBULANCE took almost two hours to get an injured girl to a hospital which was just a 10-minute drive away.
Ten-year-old Chloe Banks kept asking her distraught mum, "Am I going to die?" as she lay in the road vomiting and bleeding after being hit by a car outside a skate park.
Paramedics were at the scene of the accident within six minutes.
But the youngster then lay for another hour for an ambulance to arrive to take her to hospital after the satellite-navigation system sent it to the wrong street.
Even when Chloe was eventually picked up, the on-board system again failed. The journey back lasted 40 minutes.
It took Chloe and her mum Maggie Banks, 39, from the accident scene near their home in Greenside, Gateshead, through the rural villages of Rowlands Gill, High Spen and Chopwell instead of the direct route along the A695 road to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
Advertisement
Click Here
Mum-of-three Maggie, 39, said: "We had to wait for almost an hour for the ambulance to come.
"I thought we would go then straight to hospital but they went round Rowlands Gill and Swalwell.
"We told them it was not the quickest way. The driver was really apologetic but he said he had to go by the satellite navigation system."
North-East Ambulance Service said it would examine whether there was a problem with the satnav.
There was no ambulance crew in Gateshead to take her to hospital.
But a crew from Sunderland became available at 1.54pm after dropping a patient in Newcastle.
The crew was delayed when the satnav system guided them to a narrow road in nearby Ryton, which they were unable to negotiate, forcing them to be manually guided by A&E control - eventually arriving at the scene at 2.26pm.
The North East Ambulance Service in England apologised to the family for the incident on April 21.
North-East Ambulance service's Patient and Public Involvement Forum chairman Michael Dalton said he would monitor the use of satnav systems in ambulances.
He added: "Satellite navigation can be very effective when it is used correctly and with local knowledge. It should not be relied on by itself."