University Of CO Analysis Predicts That Romney Will Win Election

[Phyphor]

They (Obama and co.) are getting desperate.

I used to get one E-mail per day from Barak and Michelle.  Now, I get two-three e-mails per day begging for money because they are being out raised and out spent by Romney and Co.   And if I send in $5 I get entered for a chance to be front row (With round trip airfare and accommodations) at the DNC Convention, with Michelle and Barak.      I really don't think they'd want me there.  

I want this to happen.  I keep throwing money at my monitor, but it's just not working, dammit!

[Phyphor]

At this point, I suspect Romney sees 'you can't lose this one' as a personal challenge.

It sure seems like it.  I just wonder how the HELL he won the prim....oh wait, yea... I just remembered.  Nevermind.
 

[slingshot]

This election is going to a classic example of nobody voting for anyone, and everyone who votes making their choice on the basis of "the lesser of two evils."

Name a potential candidate that would not be a vote for the lesser of two evils for anyone that pays attention to politics?

[Blakenzy]

I'm beginning to hope Romney wins, not because I have any trust or expectations in him over Obama but because it will show all those "anyone but Obama" I-don't-want-to-throw-my-vote-away folk that voting for the lesser evil is still voting for evil and it leads no where good. When Romney doesn't magically mature in to the Constitution loving conservative many would like him to be, when he pulls the same S*** his blue cloaked counterpart did, when things keep getting worse and people begin to realize what they have brought unto themselves I'm going to have my Nelson Muntz moment.



Yeah, and it will be sweet for about two seconds until I remember that I'm in the same hole.

[MechAg94]

I'm beginning to hope Romney wins, not because I have any trust or expectations in him over Obama but because it will show all those "anyone but Obama" I-don't-want-to-throw-my-vote-away folk that voting for the lesser evil is still voting for evil and it leads no where good. When Romney doesn't magically mature in to the Constitution loving conservative many would like him to be, when he pulls the same S*** his blue cloaked counterpart did, when things keep getting worse and people begin to realize what they have brought unto themselves I'm going to have my Nelson Muntz moment.



Yeah, and it will be sweet for about two seconds until I remember that I'm in the same hole.

And there are some using the same logic hoping that Obama will win for essentially the same reasons.  I hear the same tired logic at every election and the same people still have no workable solutions other than go hide until everything falls apart.   

Romney won't do anything on his own anyway.  Changing the make up of Congress is only way to make any positive changes. 

[RoadKingLarry]

Does the analysis account for Chicago style fraud?

[Scout26]

Does the analysis account for Chicago style fraud?

No matter how much fraud they commit in Chicago, he can't get more than 20 electoral votes from Illinois.

VoterID laws have put Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in play.

[RoadKingLarry]

The fraud won't just be in Chicago. It'll be in every major city and the aftermath will make the 2000 Bush V. Gore look like small claims court.

[Perd Hapley]

...the 2010 Bush V. Gore look like small claims court.

I must have missed that one. Sounds epic. 

[RoadKingLarry]

Meh, typo. Fixed.

[Ron]

They have updated their forecast:

With the presidential election a little more than a month away, political science professors from the University of Colorado have updated their election forecast with more current economic conditions and are standing by their prediction that Mitt Romney will win.

The professors -- Kenneth Bickers of CU's Boulder campus and Michael Berry of CU's Denver campus -- project that Romney will earn 330 of the total 538 Electoral College votes.

http://www.coloradodaily.com/ci_21698333/cu-boulder-profs-updated-forecast-still-gives-win?source=most_viewed#axzz29B9cxnO5

[AJ Dual]

No matter how much fraud they commit in Chicago, he can't get more than 20 electoral votes from Illinois.

VoterID laws have put Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in play.

I wish. Like some other states, they've held up the law in the courts just so, (judge shopping, Dane County, where Madison is...)  to ensure they wouldn't be in place one last time for this coming election. 

And we know the law will ultimately be upheld. It's modeled after Indiana's which has won in the SCOTUS.

Although hopefully it'll help us here in WI from now on.

[Scout26]

No chance it'll be kicked up to the next level before the election?

[kgbsquirrel]

No chance it'll be kicked up to the next level before the election?

With the glacial pace of our legal system? In the words of a soldier that you really never want to hear on a battlefield, "the outcome is doubtful."

[Scout26]

I thought that it was still at state level.  (The vote fraud groups finding a friendly state judge in Madison.)  I was referring to the State District, Appeals, or the state Supreme Court for an injunction against the injunction.

Let anyone not able to produce ID vote provisionally.


<--- Technical Election Judge (Head election judge at a my polling place.  Yes, I got Promoted this year. )