Author Topic: A "taster"? Really?  (Read 2537 times)

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
A "taster"? Really?
« on: March 16, 2013, 07:21:17 PM »
http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=34579

POTUS passes up lunch with Senate Repubs because his "taster" was not available.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/14/obama-couldnt-eat-at-hill-meeting-without-taster-audio/#ixzz2NdF0mssG

Well, he did take a chance on the ice cream.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2013, 07:23:28 PM »
Wonder if the "taster" is covered under Obamacare?
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,217
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2013, 08:17:10 PM »
I have read in a couple of books about the Secret Service that the 'taster' concept has been around for many years, long predating this Administration. 
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2013, 08:26:52 PM »
Well, yeah.

I know Roman emperors like Julius Caesar had one, and the concept predates them.

In the words of Mel Brooks, "It's good to be the king!"
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2013, 08:31:09 PM »
I would have thought the concept be a bit out-dated. Isn't it easier (and safer for the SS) to plug some food samples into a portable chromatograph (or whatever apparatus that would be appropriate) to check for toxins?

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2013, 10:02:52 PM »
I would have thought the concept be a bit out-dated. Isn't it easier (and safer for the SS) to plug some food samples into a portable chromatograph (or whatever apparatus that would be appropriate) to check for toxins?

This.

What is Ricin supposed to taste like anyway? And IIRC, it takes a couple hours before symptoms arise anyway.

I promise not to duck.

Waitone

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,133
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2013, 12:28:15 AM »
No news.  A taster has been around for multiple presidents.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."
- Charles Mackay, Scottish journalist, circa 1841

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it." - John Lennon

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,274
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2013, 12:59:58 AM »
I'll assume that the taster has been around for many presidents. If asked to blind guess, I'd say started in FDR years. So, no news. What is news to me is the president has no leadership. Sit around not eating because your taster isn't there like a 1st grader waiting for the bus? Wow. How about "I'm the president, I own the secret service, so lets say screw them, I'm eating lobster."

The whole concept is pretty offensive to me, just not his fault in particular. So we can assume all the man of the people crap of stopping restaurants out of the blue is all highly staged?
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

CNYCacher

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,438
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2013, 09:08:49 AM »
"Here, eat this to make sure it's not poisoned."

That guy is either a true believer, or paid extremely well.
On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
Charles Babbage

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,217
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2013, 09:52:46 AM »
On a documentary about Air Force One, I saw how the support crew wears civilian clothes and drive civilian vehicles around to a number of different stores in the greater Washington DC area to buy food for the aircraft.  This is to make it more difficult for someone to poison or contaminate the food for the passengers on the flight. I thought that was pretty clever.

I once met a guy who claimed to be on the service crew for AF1 back in the 90's and he said that the background check and vetting process for that was more thorough than his clearance to work on SAC nuclear bombers.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2013, 03:37:02 PM »
No news.  A taster has been around for multiple presidents.
1.  It is news, just not news that Obama hired a taster.  That position has been around.
2.  It is news that Obama is making excuses based on not having a taster.  That means he either needed an excuse or actually relies on the person.

I gotta think it would be easier to monitor the origin of the food and it's preparation than to hire someone to taste it.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,714
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2013, 06:39:06 PM »

The whole concept is pretty offensive to me, just not his fault in particular.

Okay, if the "taster" is a real thing, and by that I mean the common definition of someone who tastes for potentially poisoned food, then I'm with French on this is. Not just offensive, but abhorrent.

The US is supposed to be the epitome of freedom. A "food taster" is what I expect of dictatorships and totalitarian regimes of the worst order. I expect Lil' Kim in North Korea to have one, I wouldn't have even expected Castro or Chavez to have one. That our presidents have one is almost incomprehensible to me. Even if there are threats, our presidents should handle it another way besides finding a human guinea pig. We are supposed to value life more than that. And as for the guinea pig -- when does that get to be a fun job?  

I can only hope this is all a gross misrepresentation by the media.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2013, 09:14:27 PM »
Frankly, it's the technicalities of the position I complained about above that still bother me the most. Anything some well organized conspiracy would use wouldn't have a taste, and would work slowly enough to bypass the taster.

I'm thinking this job is kept around more for preventing nuisance attacks like some disgruntled kitchen staff dumping a bunch of salt, hot sauce, or some cleaning supplies into the food, or (insert bodily substance "X" here) than preventing actual poisoning by 'terrists or state-level actors.

I promise not to duck.

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2013, 09:39:33 PM »
Frankly, it's the technicalities of the position I complained about above that still bother me the most. Anything some well organized conspiracy would use wouldn't have a taste, and would work slowly enough to bypass the taster.

I'm thinking this job is kept around more for preventing nuisance attacks like some disgruntled kitchen staff dumping a bunch of salt, hot sauce, or some cleaning supplies into the food, or (insert bodily substance "X" here) than preventing actual poisoning by 'terrists or state-level actors.


Food quality taster is actually a reasonable, if not expected, sort of job. Simply from a caterer quality assurance point of view (or as my Mom would have put it, never trust a skinny cook) you don't want to be serving folks misprepared/seasoned food, and the only real way to check for that is through smell and tasting said food.

Triphammer

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2013, 09:44:30 PM »
Maybe he's allergic to shellfish. Maybe he's keeping kosher. That's our current Whitehouse occupant's "thinking on his feet". Just like "the Secret Service stopped the tours".

kgbsquirrel

  • APS Photoshop God
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,466
  • Bill, slayer of threads.
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2013, 09:46:08 PM »
Maybe he's allergic to shellfish. Maybe he's keeping kosher halal. That's our current Whitehouse occupant's "thinking on his feet". Just like "the Secret Service stopped the tours".

(Sorry, it was too easy.)

Triphammer

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2013, 10:08:19 PM »
Though it would explain why Bo isn't allowed on AF1 when B.O. is aboard.

lee n. field

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,822
  • tinpot megalomaniac, Paulbot, hardware goon
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2013, 10:15:48 PM »
Maybe he's allergic to shellfish. Maybe he's keeping kosher.

It's "halal", but nevermind.   

 [tinfoil]
In thy presence is fulness of joy.
At thy right hand pleasures for evermore.

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: A "taster"? Really?
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2013, 09:44:12 AM »
Food quality taster is actually a reasonable, if not expected, sort of job. Simply from a caterer quality assurance point of view (or as my Mom would have put it, never trust a skinny cook) you don't want to be serving folks misprepared/seasoned food, and the only real way to check for that is through smell and tasting said food.

That is what the chef is for.  They are not the cook, but QC before it goes out the door.

QC was not what POTUS apparently was referring to.  It might have been a poor attempt at a dig at the Repubs.  If so, it was in the poorest of (excuse the phrasing) taste.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.