If you are unable to comprehend without my help how that quote looks completely cartoonish to anybody who does not already accept your worldview, I recommend you continue quoting it as often as possible in the company of such individuals.
On second thought; the quotation I posted is so apt, and your reaction to it is so off-base, that I figured I'd point out a few things.
Firstly, your first response was not at all clear. Thanks for being so snarky when I asked you to explain.
Moving on, the quotation is actually meant to be a paraphrase, or maybe a summary, of something said by Nietzsche (by way of Ravi Zacharias). And Nietzsche does not accept my weltanschauung.
As cartoonish as you may think the Nietzsche/Zacharias theory to be, it cannot be more cartoonish than the outlandish characters we're talking about here. Bloomberg, a man so possessed by the authoritarian spirit that he tried to regulate the size of New Yorkers' soft drinks; and Weiner, a guy so enslaved by adolescent sexual impulses that he threw away a Congressional seat and humiliated himself publicly, just so he could feel like a stud on the internet. These guys are caricatures, and fit just so in the two categories.
Do I expect that quotation to convert
Jesus-stomping atheists into born-again, Spirit-filled snake-handlers? No. That wasn't the point.
