R.I.P. Scout26
So let me get this straight - if I carried a gun under a nice suit in NYC, I would have nothing to fear from the cops
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Sure. When they have a warrant from a judge or probable cause.I'm quite sure that any police chief that implemented this where I live would be fired within a day. It would probably help crime stats if we threw all poor people into ovens. Doesn't mean it's the right or ethical thing to do.With respect, CSD, nothing wrong with trolling the APS folks here, we need a court jester... I know you don't take the position of "anything good for the police is good for the country". If you do, you may want to take a few moments to reflect on that.
you didn't read about stop and frisk in newark? and how the aclu et al signed off on it?
Even in nyc it was the stopping folf of color that was the issue. Expect to see more not less stop.and frisk. Just more high sun block numbers. Like the tsa does. Only its bad then good nowdamn phone
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.
This is what you don't seem to get.No matter what the ACLU thinks, no matter what or how a given judge rules on the issue, the PRACTICE OF STOP AND FRISK IS BLATANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.It may be permitted without the racial component now, because of the ruling. THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT
First, IMO, the stop & frisk tactic is a violation of the 4th amendment.But, if 80+% of the crimes are committed by OTW (other than white), why is it not "fair" for 80+% of the stops to be of folks who are OTW?/putting down the pot-stirring ladle