Author Topic: SFD bans helmet cameras after filming the truck running over a crash victim  (Read 3369 times)

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,217
  • APS Risk Manager
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20130818/NEWS02/708189889#After-airliner-crash-S.F.-chief-bans-helmet-cams

As a risk manager, I am of the opinion that this sort of video is usually more helpful than harmful in liability situations.  I have no problem with the concept of helmet cams, dash cams, cameras worn by police, people filming the birth of their baby, etc.  As long as you respect the privacy issues and personal preference (for example, many hospital staff refuse to be filmed), my experience has been that the video can often be of benefit if things go wrong and a subsequent claim is filed.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
She must have great faith in the training and effectiveness of her FD  ;/
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Levant

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
This shows clear intent to deceive the public.  THey weren't concerned about privacy before running over a crash victim.  Without a camera, they would certainly have lied about this case, too.  In fact, they told a different story until the camera video was requested.  We can't be sure if it was because they truly didn't know the story or if they didn't know they couldn't suppress the video.

This is one of the most blatant abuses of government I have heard in a long time.  If government truly believes that privacy counts more than video I suppose we won't be seeing those drones in the USA after all.
NEOKShooter on GRM
Republicans: The other Democratic Party

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
People have rights, such as a "right to privacy".

Governments, as often pointed out in debates about Constitutional and Federal/State issues have powers. Governments do not have "rights".

Government powers may dictate the ability to have secrecy and security in certain circumstances, but the .gov does not have a right to privacy.
I promise not to duck.

Monkeyleg

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,589
  • Tattaglia is a pimp.
    • http://www.gunshopfinder.com
Does the fire department run over victims so often that the cameras are a problem? ;)

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
I guess we need victim cams. Spool the last 12 hours in a loop, 3-4G upload service, to Dropbox, maybe somewhere overseas that's at least somewhat NSA-proof, and a copy to your retained attorney.

Take the whole "Every Russian has a dashcam" concept right to the next level and get it over with.  =)
I promise not to duck.

BlueStarLizzard

  • Queen of the Cislords
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,039
  • Oh please, nobody died last time...
*snort*
First responders and EMTs are already privy to sensitive personal information. The privacy issue would be how the data collected (regardless of medium) was disseminated, not that it was collected in the first place.

It's a BS excuse to hide screw ups. The really annoying part isn't so much that they want to hide screws ups, but rather how pathetically obvious the lie is.
"Okay, um, I'm lost. Uh, I'm angry, and I'm armed, so if you two have something that you need to work out --" -Malcolm Reynolds

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
*snort*
First responders and EMTs are already privy to sensitive personal information. The privacy issue would be how the data collected (regardless of medium) was disseminated, not that it was collected in the first place.

It's a BS excuse to hide screw ups. The really annoying part isn't so much that they want to hide screws ups, but rather how pathetically obvious the lie is.

You can fool most of the people most of the time  =(
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,037
The fire chief said "There comes a time that privacy of the individual is paramount, of greater importance than having a video."

OK that's the fire department . . . . but if government is REALLY concerned about a person's privacy, then shouldn't the police stop taking and releasing mug shots as well?

No, this is an embarassingly transparent ploy to prevent evidence of mistakes from being gathered.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
There is something in the water out there.  Kills any sense of reality.  Makes jerks out of people.

That's my theory and I'm stickin' to it.

Angel Eyes

  • Lying dog-faced pony soldier
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,138
  • You're not diggin'
Update: the SFFD is back-pedaling, sort-of.  Officials say the department will "revisit" the issue.

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SFFD-backtracks-may-allow-helmet-cameras-4744090.php
"... and now I want to hand it over to the president of Ukraine who has as much courage as he has determination.  Ladies and gentlemen, President Putin."
                          - Joe Biden, July 11, 2024

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Sadly most of what gets classified today is not "The XM-2954 round can penetrate Y millimeters of armor and if the Rooskies/Chinese/Norks find out they just add Y+1 millimeters of armor to their tanks."  99.99999% of what gets classified is "Wow, can't let this get out, it'll be embarrassing." Or "Oh *expletive deleted*it, I might go to jail for this screwup."
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

Levant

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
Sadly most of what gets classified today is not "The XM-2954 round can penetrate Y millimeters of armor and if the Rooskies/Chinese/Norks find out they just add Y+1 millimeters of armor to their tanks."  99.99999% of what gets classified is "Wow, can't let this get out, it'll be embarrassing." Or "Oh *expletive deleted*, I might go to jail for this screwup."

Governments have always kept secrets from those that they believe to be their enemies.  Why do you think they keep so many from us?
NEOKShooter on GRM
Republicans: The other Democratic Party

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Sadly most of what gets classified today is not "The XM-2954 round can penetrate Y millimeters of armor and if the Rooskies/Chinese/Norks find out they just add Y+1 millimeters of armor to their tanks."  99.99999% of what gets classified is "Wow, can't let this get out, it'll be embarrassing." Or "Oh *expletive deleted*, I might go to jail for this screwup."

I used to think the majority of TS stuff was classified to cover up incompetence or low level corruption. At this point I think it's more likely to be severe violations of the law that are getting swept under the rug.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Oh, and there's always the "Can't comment on an ongoing investigation."

That always bothers me.  I'm sure there are good reasons for it most of the time, but it sure is usable for....   "other things."

Terry