Huh, if that's true it's unfortunate.
I'm still waiting for you to explain how a teen girl kicking a shoe justifies her being kicked in the stomach, grabbed by the hair, slammed into a wall, thrown to the floor, and then punched twice in the back of the head as the deputy knelt on her back.
Please, enlighten me as to how that's justified.
i take it you still haven't read the second article?
i think the juror addressed that in the link you missed. i only had the you tube vid to work off. they had a lil bit more.
oops the link i posted was wrong one try this
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2012317057_schene10m.htmlAs jurors left the courthouse after a mistrial was declared, a male juror, who did not give his name, said of Schene's conduct, "It was a very strong show of force, but the fact she was not injured during the process shows he followed the techniques he was trained to use."
The prosecution didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that unreasonable and unnecessary force was used, the juror said.
Jurors who voted 11-1 to convict in Schene's is first trial believed he followed accepted training techniques, but the majority ultimately concluded he did not need to use those techniques in the first place to subdue Calhoun, the chief juror said in an interview in February.
Schene could have shut the cell door or yelled at Calhoun, the juror said.
Satterberg, in explaining his decision not to try Schene a third time, noted the "combined score" of 12 to 12 over two trials, saying sometimes a "no-decision is still a decision."
While people have formed their own opinions about what they saw on the videotape, jurors were careful in reaching their own decisions, Satterberg said.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2012255285_schene02m.html