Author Topic: I have been waiting  (Read 646 times)

LAK

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
I have been waiting
« on: August 29, 2006, 02:40:10 AM »
... to see these guys notice what is coming down the Pan-American pipe. I wonder how the huge paycuts are going to be explained away this time. But they can "all go to school" of course, "learn a new skill" and join the rapidly shrinking list of fields that actually get paid more than a bag of peanuts in this country anymore.

------------------------------

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51712

Tuesday, August 29, 2006 Morning Edition

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
NAFTA superhighway to mean Mexican drivers, say Teamsters
Union warns of drug-taking truckers, unsafe rigs on planned trade routes

Posted: August 28, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON  The NAFTA superhighway, a north-south interstate trade corridor linking Mexico, Canada and the U.S., would mean U.S. truckers replaced by Mexicans, more unsafe rigs on American roads and more drivers relying on drugs for their long hauls, charges the International Brotherhood of Teamsters  the latest group to weigh in against the Bush administration plan.

The August issue of Teamster magazine features a cover story on the plan for an enlarged I-35 that will reach north from the drug capital border town of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, 1,600 miles to Canada through San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, Kansas City, Minneapolis and Duluth, while I-69 originating at the same crossing will shoot north to Michigan and across the Canadian border.

Public proposals for the superhighway calls for each corridor to be 1,200 feet wide with six lanes devoted to cars, four to trucks, with a rail line and utilities in the middle. Most of the goods will come from new Mexican ports being built on the Pacific Coast  ports being run by Chinese state-controlled shipping companies.


"Tens of thousands of unregulated, unsafe Mexican trucks will flow unchecked through out border  a very real threat to the safety of our highways, homeland security and good-paying American jobs," writes Teamster President Jim Hoffa. "The Bush administration hasn't given up on its ridiculous quest to open our border to unsafe Mexican trucking companies. In fact, Bush is quietly moving forward with plans to build the massive network of highways from the Mexican border north through Detroit into Canada that would make cross-border trucking effortless."

So incensed was the union over the plan for the NAFTA superhighway that it sent investigative reporter Charles Bowden to Mexico for its August magazine report on the problems affecting Mexican drivers  problems that could soon come home to Americans with the plans for the new intercontinental highways.

Drivers interviewed for the magazine report say they are exploited by companies that force them to drive 4,500 kilometers alone over the course of five or six nights without sleep. How do they stay awake on such long hauls?

One driver says, "professional secret." Another laughs, "magic dust." Others mention "special chemicals."

"And then they are off, a torrent of words and quips and smiles, and a knowing discussion of that jolt when a line of cocaine locks in," writes Bowden. "They are all family men who run the highways at least 25 days a month and they are adamant about two things  that nobody can run these long hauls without cocaine and crystal meth, and now and then some marijuana to level out the rush. And the biggest danger on their endless runs comes from addicted Mexican truck drivers, which means all truck drivers."

Mexican drivers, of course, earn considerably less than their U.S. counterparts  about $1,100 a month. Hoffa says the NAFTA superhighway plan would "allow global conglomerates to capitalize by exploiting cheap labor and non-existent work rules and avoiding potential security enhancements at U.S. ports."

The drivers interviewed for Teamster magazine say they are completely at the mercy of their employers, the Mexican government and police  who are the first to rob them. All of those interviewed said they have killed people with their trucks on the highways and fled the accident sites.

Hoffa calls NAFTA an "unqualified disaster" up to now  and wonders why the nation continues to pursue the "free trade" agenda. Instead of creating new jobs, he said, it has cost 3 million in manufacturing alone. Instead of creating trade surpluses, America's trade deficit is the worst ever, he says.

"If there's a positive side to the disastrous legacy of NAFTA, it's that it has made it a little harder for the free trade cabal to wrap their lies around subsequent job-killing deals," says Hoffa. "While the White House and Senate still have a majority who continue to support the free trade agenda, their ranks have shrunk over the years  sometimes due to members of Congress changing their minds and sometimes due to voters changing their member of Congress."

He adds: "If the Bush administration succeeds (with the NAFTA superhighway), American drivers and their families will be forced to share the roads with unsafe, uninsured trucks and millions of good-paying American jobs will be lost. And just one weapon of mass destruction in an unchecked container will be too many."
[END]

--------------------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org

Art Eatman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,442
I have been waiting
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2006, 04:31:32 AM »
The frustrating part of this for me is easy:  We already have Mexican trucks and drivers coming in.  The trucks must pass the inspections and get a sticker, and they're good to go.  The driver must have the appropriate license, and he's good to go.

Somebody try to make me believe that US drivers don't exceed the allowable hours of driving, don't do "Whites", etc., and never, ever smuggle anything.  Now, try again.

By the bye:  The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that the U.S. needs to spend some two trillion dollars over the next ten years on MAINTENANCE of EXISTING infrastructure facilities.  That includes highways, bridges, railroads and pipelines.  A helluva lot of that is public tax dollar stuff.

Okay:  So in order to meet the growing demand for highways and railroads to haul all that crap folks buy and that folks manufacture for export, we need more highways and railroads--but we ain't really got the money.  So, an outside consortium to finance and administer.  So far, it seems that only a Spanish group is interested.

Hey, it's the Libertarian way, isn't it?  Private sector?

Something I just flat-out don't understand:  We sell to Canada and Mexico.  They sell to us.  It's called "trade".  Been going on since way before I was born.  How is a smooth, connecting, less-congested highway gonna "destroy our sovereignty"?  We already have I-35, which is a nightmare.  Why is a new highway gonna make the cows go dry and the hens quit laying?

Art
The American Indians learned what happens when you don't control immigration.

Sylvilagus Aquaticus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 833
    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/sylvilagus
I have been waiting
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2006, 07:51:41 PM »
Hell, we have that now in Dallas. Nothing unusual about this.  Last year a Polish citizen  driving an 18 wheeler under the influence of prescription drugs illegally brought into the country killed a family on I-35 north of Dallas when he crossed the median.

Now there's a move to put a barrier down the median of the Interstates around here due to the high incidence of crossover accidents involving head-on impacts at high speeds.

Don't put all of it on lax controls of foreign truckers from the north and south.  We have plenty of US based trucks what are operating in violation of safety laws. Last time I heard of a DPS checkpoint around here, 16 of 18 stopped in that shift were in violation of statute and were impounded.

I realize we need more infrastructure to handle the increased traffic. We also need to update and improve the existing highways, bridges, overpasses and rails.  I don't have an alternative, but I don't think taking a quarter-mile wide swath for a mega highway with rail, data, and traffic lanes is the acceptable way to cut a swath across farmland.


Rabbit.
To punish me for my contempt for authority, fate made me an authority myself.
Albert Einstein

J.J.

  • Just your average
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 835
I have been waiting
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2006, 08:02:38 PM »
Quote from: LAK
... Public proposals for the superhighway calls for each corridor to be 1,200 feet wide with six lanes devoted to cars, four to trucks, with a rail line and utilities in the middle.
No need to worry.  They have been working on expanding I-35 in New Braunfels for almost 10 years.  And that has been just to expand it to 4 lanes each way.