I'm not sure I understand this decision. I heard that SCOTUS said unions can't collect union dues from people who are home and taking care of aged parents/family.
Huh? I mean, said person isn't even being paid, nor is actually "employed" (ie., at a job, with contract, being paid agreed-upon salary, and so forth) and I don't see how unions expect to collect dues from such a person.
Any union dweeb showing up at my door should I be taking care of infirm family member will be looking down the barrel of one of my firearms.
Something is wrong with the above -- certainly I missed part of the explanation or the news readers have been doing a half-arsed job of 'splainin'.
What gives? Where'd I go agly?