How about Romans vs Jews, Turks vs Kurds, Chinese vs Tibetans? British vs Indians, Russians vs Afghans, one could go on.
Come on now. In all those cases, there were additional constraints of various types. Just like I pointed out in an earlier post.
The Romans were utterly successful in crushing the revolt and subjugating the jews. The only reason why there are still jews around today is because the Romans were a slaveowning society that looked upon military campaigns as a form of harvesting operation. Since the jews were far more useful alive than dead, those who submitted (by far the majority) were taken prisoner, enslaved, and sold all over the empire. Vespasian and Titus made piles of gold in the transaction.
The turks could not wipe out the kurds because they wanted membership in the EU and because population is a source of tax revenue.
The Chinese wanted to reeducate, not wipe out the Tibetans. In addition, communist ideology is all about "freeing the oppressed" and "class education" as opposed to military action by any means necessary. The same held true for Russians in Afghanistan. The goal was to turn Tibetans and Afghans into commies, not wipe them out.
The British wanted natural resources and trade, not military conquest by the time of Ghandi. Compare their 1950s reaction to their 1850s reaction. Ghandi would have been strapped to a cannon and executed too if he were a Sipai (Sepoy) in 1857.
Liberal historical wishful propaganda is not history. Mantras are not facts, but propaganda tools. Learn to separate the seed from the chaff.
Force worked for a little while but ultimately failed, as LB pointed out.
You are free to repeat liberal untruth as many times as you wish. It does not make it so, no matter what Goebbels used to say.
And do we really want to choose Spanish Conquistadors and other unsavory types as our role models?
That is irrelevant to your argument. Nice redirection try, though. Dude, you have to clean up your arguing act. It is okay to argue whatever you wish. Just do it in a clean logical way. Your currents methods are simply silly and quite transparent. Besides, the liberal arguing points and techniques make you sound like a troll.