Author Topic: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???  (Read 9319 times)

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« on: November 12, 2014, 02:14:47 PM »
This seems strange.  I was reading about the Korean "Axe Murders," where UN personnel were sent out to cut down a tree in the demilitarized zone and were attacked by NK forces:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axe_murder_incident

One item that caught my attention was that afterward, UN forces went out in "overwhelming force" to cut the tree down (bolding mine):

Quote
In addition, a 64-man South Korean special forces company accompanied them, armed with clubs and trained in Tae Kwon Do, supposedly without firearms. However, once they parked their trucks near the Bridge of No Return, they started throwing out the sandbags that lined the truck bottoms, and handing out M-16 rifles and M-79 grenade launchers that had been concealed below.[2] Several of the special forces men also had Claymore mines strapped to their chests with the firing mechanism in their hands, and were shouting at the North Koreans to cross the bridge.[14][15]

Don't know anything about Claymore mines, but it struck me that the recoil and side-blast, if any, would have been dangerous enough that having one go off on one's chest right below one's face would not be a good idea.

Qs:

(1)  Am I mistaken about the recoil?  Seems anything that's going to throw a bunch of projectiles out frontwards, must come back (recoil) with a considerable kick.

(2)  Was this common practice for some kinds of military occasions?

(3)  Is perhaps the wiki article in error?

It just sounded kind of weird to me.

The incident does, however, reinforce the theory of "Peace through superior firepower." :D

Terry, 230RN

« Last Edit: November 12, 2014, 02:23:45 PM by 230RN »

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re:
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2014, 02:35:34 PM »
Korean kamikaze
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2014, 02:38:26 PM »
This seems strange.  I was reading about the Korean "Axe Murders," where UN personnel were sent out to cut down a tree in the demilitarized zone and were attacked by NK forces:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axe_murder_incident

One item that caught my attention was that afterward, UN forces went out in "overwhelming force" to cut the tree down (bolding mine):

Don't know anything about Claymore mines, but it struck me that the recoil and side-blast, if any, would have been dangerous enough that having one go off on one's chest right below one's face would not be a good idea.

Qs:

(1)  Am I mistaken about the recoil?  Seems anything that's going to throw a bunch of projectiles out frontwards, must come back (recoil) with a considerable kick.

Yes, the blast force hitting against your chest would be pretty severe, although claymores were regularly used set up free-standing.

(2)  Was this common practice for some kinds of military occasions?

Is bat-guano crazy a military occupation?  I met some ROK Marines in Vietnam - they did not do the pull-the-still-beating-heart-out-of-a-water-bullalo thing, but I would like to be several hundred yards away, on open terrain, when they started coming at me.

(3)  Is perhaps the wiki article in error?

What are the odds that Wiki (the most frequentl;y cited source) is correct?  50-50 on a good day?

It just sounded kind of weird to me.

The incident does, however, reinforce the theory of "Peace through superior firepower." :D

Terry, 230RN

My conversations with folks who were stationed on the DMZ says that our side did not attempt to provoke the Norks.  Patrols going to anything other than sling arms pretty much required permission from higher authority.  OTOH, static emplacements were reported as locked, loaded, and actively sighted in on individual targets or groups.

It's likely that any snatch and grab attempt is ging to be met with the judicious use of impact weapons.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re:
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2014, 02:40:18 PM »
Korean kamikaze

The Koreans that I was aware of would not do kamikaze.  Coming back with the heads of their enemy on the ends of poles would be more likely.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,741
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2014, 02:43:14 PM »
1. No you aren't mistaken.  It's a mine.  It blows up.  only most of the blast goes forward. The min safe distance to the rear and sides of the mine is 16 meters.  Having one on your chest go off would reduce you to red goo.  maybe some boots.

2. No, That is not AFAIK doctrine in any real military.  Troops enjoy survival.

3. Perhaps.  On the other hand the ROC marines I've gotten drunk with were some crazy MoFo's. Like seriously crazy.  So perhaps not.

wmenorr67

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,775
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2014, 03:06:10 PM »
1. No you aren't mistaken.  It's a mine.  It blows up.  only most of the blast goes forward. The min safe distance to the rear and sides of the mine is 16 meters.  Having one on your chest go off would reduce you to red goo.  maybe some boots.

2. No, That is not AFAIK doctrine in any real military.  Troops enjoy survival.

3. Perhaps.  On the other hand the ROC marines I've gotten drunk with were some crazy MoFo's. Like seriously crazy.  So perhaps not.

The ROC Marines I met were crazy. 
There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar.

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier.  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Bacon is the candy bar of meats!

Only the dead have seen the end of war!

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2014, 05:38:37 PM »
I consider it a form of peacocking.  The SKs wearing the claymores absolutely didn't want to light them off.

HOWEVER, consider the NK's reactions upon realizing what's going on.  A single claymore would kill most of the SK party, but it would kill everybody in front of it(IE the NK's) even further out.

It's saying 'I'm a crazy Mofo, don't mess with me'.  The goal was to intimidate the NK's for long enough to get the tree chopped down as reports on the NK side went up and down the chain.  It worked.

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2014, 06:24:49 PM »
1. No you aren't mistaken.  It's a mine.  It blows up.  only most of the blast goes forward. The min safe distance to the rear and sides of the mine is 16 meters.  Having one on your chest go off would reduce you to red goo.  maybe some boots.

2. No, That is not AFAIK doctrine in any real military.  Troops enjoy survival.

3. Perhaps.  On the other hand the ROC marines I've gotten drunk with were some crazy MoFo's. Like seriously crazy.  So perhaps not.

OK, thanks, all.  That's about what I figured, but my impression from the article was that it was Americans who strapped claymores to their chests, from the words "several of the special forces men..."

I guess I assumed "special forces" meant U.S. personnel.

Terry

Phantom Warrior

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 926
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2014, 10:24:42 PM »
Like dogmush said, Claymores are an explosive, plain and simple.  It is a directional mine because there are bunch of steel balls on top of the explosive that are launched across the impact area like a giant shotgun shell.  But it is still 12 ounces of C4.  Touching that off in contact with your body wouldn't leave anything behind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_Claymore_mine#Description

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2014, 04:47:34 AM »
Or, as dogmush said, maybe a pair of boots.  (I laughed at that remark when I read it.)

From Phantom Warrior's link (bolding mine):

Quote
The force of the explosion deforms the relatively soft steel balls into a shape similar to a .22 rimfire projectile.[1] These fragments are moderately effective up to a range of 100 m (110 yd), with a hit probability of around 10% on a prone man-sized 1.3-square-foot (0.12 m2) target

Well holy cow, I thought that was interesting.  And the balls are originally smaller than a .177 pellet's diameter.

Also, this piqued my interest:

Quote
A layer of tinfoil was added between the fragmentation matrix and the explosive. This slightly improves the fragment velocity, and protects the steel fragments from the corrosive explosive. A ferrite choke was added to prevent RF signals and lightning from triggering the mine.

Makes sense.  ("RF" = Radio Frequency.  Keeps nearby radio transmitters from firing the mine.)

Terry
« Last Edit: November 16, 2014, 05:11:41 AM by 230RN »

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2014, 03:01:42 PM »
Or, as dogmush said, maybe a pair of boots.  (I laughed at that remark when I read it.)

From Phantom Warrior's link (bolding mine):

Well holy cow, I thought that was interesting.  And the balls are originally smaller than a .177 pellet's diameter.

Also, this piqued my interest:

Makes sense.  ("RF" = Radio Frequency.  Keeps nearby radio transmitters from firing the mine.)

Terry

"How bout ya Rubber Duck? You got a copy on BOOM!!!!
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2014, 03:47:15 PM »
^ LOL

"Hey, Highway Sergeant, turn yer power mike down. Yer overmodulatin', got some real bad crackling in there.  Ya wanna 10-9 that? Come awn back to this here Rubber Duckie, come awn."
« Last Edit: November 16, 2014, 03:50:20 PM by 230RN »

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2014, 10:10:13 PM »
^ LOL

"Hey, Highway Sergeant, turn yer power mike down. Yer overmodulatin', got some real bad crackling in there.  Ya wanna 10-9 that? Come awn back to this here Rubber Duckie, come awn."

I ear ya goodbuddy! (goodbuddy is not a term of endearment these days!)
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

just Warren

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,234
  • My DJ name is Heavy Cream.
Re: Claymore mines strapped to chest? ???
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2014, 10:13:08 PM »
This is something that you train the Very Special Forces to do.
Member in Good Standing of the Spontaneous Order of the Invisible Hand.