So you ask me if I've met one, and then tell me I wouldn't know it if I did. OK. So the Bruce Jenners look like chicks. How does that refute what I just said?
The question remains. If a man who claims to be a woman has to be let into a women's restroom, and if gender is a fluid concept, there's no legitimate reason to keep anyone out of said restroom. So he looks like a guy? Says who? "Looks like a guy" is no longer allowed to have any meaning. So he's attracted to women? Well, we're not keeping Lesbians out. But he's never identified as a woman before, you say? Well, who are you to say, and in any case, he identifies as a woman know.
So again, how do you keep the guy-guys out of the women's restroom?
Both ends of this debate has latched on to da stupidz.
On the conservative side, they want a blood test with a chromosome typing to prove who you are before entering a bathroom, on the left, they want anyone who identifies as anyone to use whatever bathroom they choose.
There are genetic men out there that
live, dress and identify as women, as mentioned above, you wouldn't know the difference unless they told you.
I seriously have no problem with them using the bathroom with my daughter, though I don't hang out in women's bathrooms myself, I don't think people prance around with their pants down in them.
OTOH, there are perverts that will take advantage of the situation- it would not very difficult at all to figure out who they are and call police/security to have them removed. This is where the LGBTBBQ response falls flat- they want to protect everyone at the expense of everyone else.
The problem isn't transgendered people using the bathroom they identify with, its the all-or-none attitude on both ends of the spectrum.