As an IT professional of way too many years, I agree with her suing and the judge ruling in her favor. Microsoft went to extreme lengths to intentionally deceive, trick, coerce or just flat out ignore the user in attempts to upgrade machines to an OS that is inferior in usability to Windows 7. I'm upgrading hundreds of machines to Windows 10. I use Windows 10 on my primary PC. It has a lot of great under the hood features. It's light years better than Windows 8 or 8.1. In terms of usability, it's dramatically inferior to XP or Windows 7. Microsoft is concentrating on app store, ads, cloud services, etc. Users want to be able to do their job. The two design theories, one by Microsoft and one by the user, are not quite polar opposite. But they're at least quite distant. Nothing in Windows 10 I've seen is designed for people to do work easier. Well, Edge is a very nice way to download Chrome or Mozilla. Half point there.
I absolutely hate and loath it. Yes, I DO know plenty about it, it's not "well, you just don't know what you are doing". I have to run it in enterprise environments. I'll never run it on my home network. It's a complete cast iron nightmare to get everything running appropriately. It does NOT like network deployments of anti-virus, apparently. I will run a MAC in my house before I touch Windows 10. Linux has gone full retard lately with systemd so the Mac option sadly not as bad of an option as you'd think. It's bad, but it might be the least bad of the current lot.
All of my coworkers that have moved to Windows 10 are aggravated and noticeably more hostile. Myself included. I don't blame a single one of them.