If he is not transmitting classified information......if he is copying the national archives so his work for the administration is documented.......if he is essentially not hiding anything from information requests and subpoenas........why is this an issue at all? It is only an issue because leftist Hillary fans are desperate for something they use to justify the felonies that Hillary committed.
IMO, it would be better to stick with his .gov email, but in comparison to what Hillary did, this is like a traffic ticket versus capital murder.
Because it's still a violation of the law. A fairly valid law, I might add. Preserving records to prevent politicians and unelected bureaucrats from covering up potential criminal activity is probably the most valid law I can imagine.
Yes, less so than transmitting classified documents on unclassified equipment and destruction of evidence. On the other hand, it's probably not felony worthy to the best of my knowledge. It should not be dismissed, but it also isn't the crime of the century.
