He was very nice to me, so yeah, I'd agree with that statement. I also think he was good, not spectacular but good, president. As well as personally a scumbag. Carter, I generally hold as the best human being to become president since Eisenhower. But unlike Eisenhower, easily the best president of the last century, Cart was not a great president. Sadly the ability and personality are not linked.
He was always significantly more the people person than Hillary ever was. Now it's just getting ridiculous as she believes she paid her dues and believed the election should have been her coronation. Not understanding that a lot of folks voted their pocketbooks and their annoyances. A lot of people supported her, because of party affiliation or policies. But she didn't have the personality to engage people.
Clinton - I could never understand his appeal, but I do admit that he was a very good politician, with good political instincts. (I don't know if it was his folksy downhome manner, but most people seemed to like him.) He understood what people were wanting this last election, and Hillary chose to ignore him, which is part of why she lost.
Carter - I can't think of a worse President. And the Worst Ex-President. He should have stayed in the Navy. Now he should shut his anti-Semitic piehole and just build houses.
Eisenhower - Very, Very Good President. I'd rate him as #3 for this past century. However, Reagan ended the Cold war, so he gets props and the #2 slot. #1 of course would be "Silent" Cal Coolidge.
Well, one theory I have heard circulating, that the REAL reason Bill was all for making Hillary "co-president", was that if she went to work every morning with him, he'd never have to kiss her goodbye...
You are sooooo wrong. It's probably true...