Did you not see this?
Sure, but your first statement was really in need of some context. It's not as if the Clintons are any less hypocritical than Roy Moore is alleged to be, even if their stated ideals differ. And both claim to be religious. So I found your first statement (perhaps unintentionally) misleading.
As for your last statement, that would require more of a response. You're not taking the whole situation into account, if you leave out the fact that Moore's Democratic opponent supports the murder of millions more young children than Moore has, or ever could, molest. And this is a position he and his party have taken very publicly, which has already resulted in millions of documented deaths. While Moore may be guilty, the allegations against him have yet to be substantiated.
Surely, it can and will be argued that electing Roy Moore won't stop abortion. On the other hand, electing him will also not change the laws against sexual assault.
As I've mentioned before, this is how vile we've allowed our politics to become in the past few decades. Which is not to say we haven't been there before. Slavery, and all that.