Armed Polite Society
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
R.I.P. Scout26
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Armed Polite Society
»
Main Forums
»
Politics
»
Mueller - Loose cannon?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Mueller - Loose cannon? (Read 754 times)
Hawkmoon
friend
Senior Member
Posts: 27,776
Mueller - Loose cannon?
«
on:
March 18, 2018, 10:10:12 PM »
Until I read this article, I hadn't realized that Mueller was engaged without the prerequisite list of specific crimes a special prosecutor is supposed to be charged with special prosecuting:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/muellers-investigation-flouts-justice-department-standards/
Report to moderator
Logged
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design
Andiron
friend
Senior Member
Posts: 3,930
Re: Mueller - Loose cannon?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 18, 2018, 10:13:18 PM »
How did John McClane put it?
"Welcome to the party, pal"
Report to moderator
Logged
"Leftism destroys everything good." - Ron
There is no fixing stupid. But, you can line it up in front of a wall and offer it a last smoke.
There is no such thing as a "transgender" person. Only mental illness that should be discouraged.
Hawkmoon
friend
Senior Member
Posts: 27,776
Re: Mueller - Loose cannon?
«
Reply #2 on:
March 19, 2018, 04:06:30 PM »
Here's an article from
Real Clear Politics
discussing why Mueller is NOT the right guy to be leading the Russian collaboration investigation.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/05/21/when_comey_and_mueller_bungled_the_anthrax_case_133953.html
Note: Yesterday I read another article on Mueller and the FBI's bungling of the anthrax investigation that suggested neither Hatfill not Ivins was the guilty party. Ivins committed suicide, so we'll never know. The other article mentioned that the specific strain of anthrax used in the letters was not available to Ivins in his government laboratory, and the author surmised that it must have come from a foreign state actor. This article accepts that Ivins was the guilty party.
Report to moderator
Logged
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Armed Polite Society
»
Main Forums
»
Politics
»
Mueller - Loose cannon?