So Mak, where are your citations supporting your case? With your commitment to overcoming facts inconvenient to the narrative, I would have thought you would have some. Surely the Family Research Council has something.
I could bring such things to the debate, but you would dismiss them as quickly as you just dismissed my objections.
And I'm not overcoming facts. I'm criticizing poor statistical analysis.
I don't think there is any data available and I very much doubt there ever will be, given that any data found to contradict the narrative will be attacked and suppressed.
Further, I'm fairly certain that only someone hostile to the idea of gays adopting could be trusted to find that data. Which, of course, would make his data suspect.
I am more than certain if researchers sympathetic to gay adoptions found data that indicates it may be harmful to the children, they would not publish it.
So, unless you can find me researchers hostile to gay adoptions that find it to be beneficial (or "not harmful"), I have no reason to believe your data. Unless I can find researchers sympathetic to gay adoptions who find it is harmful, you won't accept mine.
We live in times where even research is suspect.