Until we have observers capable of living millions and billions of years, evolution will remain as unprovable.
Not quite true, as evolution in response to environmental stimuli and changing conditions can and has been proven in the lab with short-lifespan fast-generation organisms, from bacteria to fruit flies.
...and yet, with all the research on fruit flies, we have created flightless fruit flies, blind fruit flies, all variety of fruit flies...BUT THEY ARE STILL FRUIT FLIES! Not horse flies, house flies - NO NEW SPECIES HAS THUS BEEN CREATED!
There's also empirical evidence such as the moths that changed their camouflage colors during the Industrial Revolution to better blend in with soot-blackened environments. Those dark-colored moths were less likely to be seen and eaten, thus, survived longer to reproduce.
... you mean you DON'T KNOW that this "story" has been proven to be faked? Dead moths were pinned to tree trunks, where they would NEVER rest, for the so-called study. Not to mention, light or darl, they are still PEPPERED MOTHS - they aren't a new species.
No, it's more a fundamental failure on the part of its proponents to conceive of the vast spans of time involved in evolution of higher species. It's an intellectual inability to get one's mind around just how long a million years is, let alone billions.
Ah, yes, the old "only smart people such as myself can grasp this" argument. The rules of the APS prevent further discourse of my opinion of this tactic....
And no, it doesn't "name" a creator, but it absolutely and completely implies that some intelligent being had to do it all, nudge nudge wink wink. Just TRY to suggest to an ID proponent that "Well, it could have been....alllliens...", and you'll be smacked down with their true colors of blatant religiousity.
Got some proof of that? An example? Didn't think so. ID doesn't claim, know or care if its God, aliens or Elvis - but its easier for you to just make up what you THINK you know about it - do you do Global Warming research?
Darwin, you see, started with observations of creatures, took notes and drawings, and, over time, formulated a theory as to HOW such things could have resulted. ID is the complete opposite, starting with a blind belief and trying to find pseudoscientific reasons that could possibly fit it.
Not according to those who do it.