Author Topic: Liberal DAs Are Criminals  (Read 9448 times)

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,172
Re: Liberal DAs Are Criminals
« Reply #75 on: February 29, 2024, 11:51:04 AM »
"Aggravated," "trespass," "weapons displayed," "weapons not displayed..."

Feh.  Feh, say I.

Get lawyers on it and draw all kinds of fine points, but that's what lawyers do.

Numeration and verbiage varies, but there's a simpler rubric:

"VII. Thou shalt not steal."

G-d said it, and He ain't takin' it back.

Terry, 230RN

"Feh", did you say?  =D  Are you arguing with us, or with the liberal DAs? 

I don't think anyone here disagrees with you, but the *punishment* for stealing legitimately could be different based on whether violence (or threat of violence) or breaking-and-entering was involved.  I was just explaining the distinction between theft, robbery, and burglary. The worthless DAs have decided that theft is not worth prosecuting, perhaps because the thieves are their constituents or perhaps out of professional courtesy.  :mad:  What's going to happen eventually when there's a pushback is all thieves will be dealt with by their intended victims or by vigilantes as presumed armed robbers.  And if it goes far enough the DAs will be targeted as accomplices.

When the justice system abrogates its responsibilities, vigilantism is back on the table.
"It's good, though..."

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,556
Re: Liberal DAs Are Criminals
« Reply #76 on: February 29, 2024, 12:29:53 PM »
^^^^

In that vein, I wonder how many more "Illegal immigrant rapes a girl, press blames girl" incidents will happen before it becomes pretty dangerous to be an immigrant in some areas.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,505
Re: Liberal DAs Are Criminals
« Reply #77 on: February 29, 2024, 12:32:11 PM »
"Feh", did you say?  =D  Are you arguing with us, or with the liberal DAs? 

I don't think anyone here disagrees with you, but the *punishment* for stealing legitimately could be different based on whether violence (or threat of violence) or breaking-and-entering was involved.  I was just explaining the distinction between theft, robbery, and burglary. The worthless DAs have decided that theft is not worth prosecuting, perhaps because the thieves are their constituents or perhaps out of professional courtesy.  :mad:  What's going to happen eventually when there's a pushback is all thieves will be dealt with by their intended victims or by vigilantes as presumed armed robbers.  And if it goes far enough the DAs will be targeted as accomplices.

When the justice system abrogates its responsibilities, vigilantism is back on the table.
All we have seen so far is big business just closing particular stores.  Which is the other option they have.  Then the same people refusing to maintain law and order complain about food deserts. 

I figure the vigilante stuff will start with the small stores owned by someone local who can't afford to move to a better area. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

230RN

  • It's like swimming to shore in an ebb tide.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,782
  • Pushing back. Help me out, here...
Re: Liberal DAs Are Criminals
« Reply #78 on: February 29, 2024, 10:37:14 PM »
"'Feh', did you say?  =D  Are you arguing with us, or with the liberal DAs?"

No, I was commenting ("Feh!") on the various "levels" that the law defines by using the words that differentiate them, when it's all violating the simple VII "thou shalt not steal."

Burglary, robbery, with or without a weapon, regardless of the amount... it's all "stealing."