David "Harvard Man" Hogg

[zxcvbob]

Sorry for your loss.  I had never heard that quote until I saw it in the movie.

It's a pretty old saying; it might even be in the Bible somewhere.

[WLJ]

    If Biden did what Mitch did today the media would be covering non stop for the next two weeks. But because it’s a Republican it’s like nothing ever happened.

    The right wing bias of corporate media is nuts.
    — David Hogg 🟧 (@davidhogg111) July 27, 2023

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2023/07/27/david-hogg-says-the-right-wing-bias-of-corporate-media-is-nuts-n2385786

Can you say gaslighting? I knew you could.
Or he's really that clueless, take your pick

Here comes Roseanne

    This tweet should be in the Smithsonian. There has never been a more democrat post in history. The lack of awareness, the lack of shame, the double standard, the absolutely insanity and soy induced frail boy bitchiness. Amazing. Absolute 10/10 https://t.co/AR4rxlr4Y7
    — Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) July 27, 2023

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2023/07/29/roseanne-destroys-david-hogg-n2385829

 

[WLJ]

Someone who has obviously never read the Constitution and/or completely lacks the ability to comprehend what he read says you need to read the Constitution

    If you believe that stronger gun laws violate the Constitution, but think that raising the voting age does not, then you should actually read the Constitution.
    — David Hogg 🟧 (@davidhogg111) November 12, 2023

And don't argue with someone smarter than you 

    I studied American history for the past four years of college. Maybe you should do your homework. https://t.co/SVwzW3Jfx7
    — David Hogg 🟧 (@davidhogg111) November 12, 2023

https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2023/11/12/noted-constitutional-scholar-david-hogg-studied-american-history-for-four-whole-years-n2389705

[dogmush]

Well this is going to leave a bad taste in my mouth:

How is Mr. Hogg wrong?

The RTBA is [supposedly] protected against infringement by the second amendment.

The voting age is set by the twenty-sixth amendment.

Either one should take a new amendment to change.  So while stronger gun laws violates the constitution, so does raising the voting age

As far as clapping back on X about hthe vast historical knowledge imparted upon him by a Harvard UNdergraduate degree, I cna't help him there.

[WLJ]

Well this is going to leave a bad taste in my mouth:

How is Mr. Hogg wrong?

The RTBA is [supposedly] protected against infringement by the second amendment.

The voting age is set by the twenty-sixth amendment.

Either one should take a new amendment to change.  So while stronger gun laws violates the constitution, so does raising the voting age

He's claiming the 2nd isn't protected against infringement by the C and he claiming that changing the voting age would violate the C while as you pointed out you can through an amendment

[dogmush]

He's claiming the 2nd isn't protected against infringement by the C and he claiming that changing the voting age would violate the C while as you pointed out you can through an amendment

I don't read that in his tweet at all.

He is claiming that anyone that believes that you can't legislate stronger gun laws due to the constitution should also believe that you can't legislate an older voting age due to the constitution.  He is correct. (stopped clock and all that)

[WLJ]

I not reading it that way but it's Hogg, better to just walk away.

[Perd Hapley]

Who's claiming the voting age can be raised w/o an amendment?

Is Hogg claiming that amending the constitution to raise the voting age would be just as bad as enacting stricter gun control? Because they're both constitutional issues? If so, do we also have to outlaw booze again?

[Angel Eyes]

I not reading it that way but it's Hogg, better to just walk away.

This.

[230RN]

Relevant, just posting for background.  The Preamble to the Bill Of Rights, stating unequivocally why the Amendments were adopted.  Bolding mine:

QUOTE

https://drexel.edu/ogcr/resources/constitution/amendments/preamble/

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added. And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

CLOSE QUOTE

I feel it necessary to point this out every once in a while.