Not that I can afford a ride on one of those old warbirds but, if I could, after the crash in Hartford and seeing video evidence of the shocking maintenance shortcuts taken with that aircraft -- there ain't no way I'd go up in one.
Obviously, The Collings Foundation put monetary concerns over flight safety with Nine-O-Nine, neglecting or postponing critical maintenance. In my opinion, that was due to a badly defective corporate culture that allowed people with bean counter mentalities to make critical flight safety decisions.
Back when I was with the AZ wing of the CAF, we did not skimp on maintenance, period. It was such an incredible piece of living history, and we all took our safety responsibilities seriously. We were extremely careful with the aircraft. If there was a flight safety-related maintenance issue, the aircraft did not fly until it was corrected. And after all, none of us wanted to crash and burn, either.
Interesting side note: One of our members who worked on Sentimental Journey with us was quite expert on the B-17G aircraft. This was because he was the crew chief on SJ when it was still in the US Army Air Force and being used for photo mapping in the Philippines after WWII. We were really blessed to have him as he knew that exact aircraft inside and out.