Maybe we just don't feel like trying to teach a pig to sing on our Saturday?
How about this...
WATCH a *expletive deleted*ing episode and see if you can, maybe, perhaps, come to your own conclusions about why they did what they did?
They even show some of black and white still photographs that you apparently believe are the path to all knowledge.
You're not even addressing the question as to why they went through all the expense of building structures equating to real buildings. I shouldn't have to warch long vids to distill an evanescent "why" if I can just ask.
I was thinking maybe it was for rehearsal or training with legal binary explosives, e.g. Tannerite, which, if I recall, are supposed to be mixed and used in no more than 10 lb quantities, used on site, and for theatrical purposes only. IIRC... there may have been modifications to that since I see all kinds of vids using way more than ten pounds, unless they (other Tannerite, for example, videographers) are licensed by batf
E and probably subject to local permitting.
Maybe these guys were licensed, and maybe they weren't, maybe they were using Tannerite, maybe not,but the question of "why" remains.
Why?
Sorry if you think I "attacked" your post, but I thought what they were doing was totally unnecessary in the light of all the past data on explosives versus buildings (not only in the blitz) and expensive and maybe the videos themselves were produced just as a cover for the sake of the "theatrical purposes" exemption. So I was looking for some kind of "realistic" explanation.
So forget about why.
Stet.
Terry, 230RN