Author Topic: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?  (Read 1441 times)

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« on: August 08, 2023, 02:53:27 PM »
Browsing around on helicopters and I sometimes wonder how in the hell they ever got developed to the point where they actually got practical.

https://youtu.be/YT39Qor9Ty0 (3:06)

Bell 47 (1941), the "M*A*S*H model."

I suppose my doubts are because all the linkages and swash plates and connections to the tail rotors are pretty much visible to the naked eye, instead of being covered up by a sleek faired body. And man, all those variable forces on that central rotor shaft !  Yikes.


Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,776
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,741
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2023, 03:26:21 PM »
The idea of vertical take off was enticing enough for folks to keep throwing money at Igor Sikorsky until he figured it out.

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2023, 03:53:12 PM »
I also discovered that one of the Batcopters, N3079G, was a Bell 47.



Also N937B, in TV's "Highway Patrol," 10-4.



I always laughed at Broderick Crawford's ability to down a bad guy at 100 yards with his little old snubby and snap shooting.  And keep his hat on.

You know, I think we have an unsung unOscared movie star in the Bell 47.

Terry, 230RN

Pic credits in Properties
« Last Edit: August 08, 2023, 04:34:06 PM by 230RN »

Cliffh

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,339
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2023, 08:37:27 PM »
That reminds me, I've still got the plans for a home-built, including prop, helicopter using a motorcycle engine.

Not sure that's ever gonna be built....

JTHunter

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,467
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2023, 09:29:48 PM »
That must be one "heck" of a motorcycle motor to power even a single seat chopper.  =|
“I have little patience with people who take the Bill of Rights for granted.  The Bill of Rights, contained in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, is every American’s guarantee of freedom.” - - President Harry S. Truman, “Years of Trial and Hope”

Cliffh

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,339
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2023, 09:37:41 PM »
IIRC, the plans call for a 650cc. 

WLJ

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32,454
  • On Patrol In The Epsilon Eridani System
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2023, 09:54:55 PM »
That must be one "heck" of a motorcycle motor to power even a single seat chopper.  =|

Early versions of the Bell 47 had a 157hp motor. Well within range of many modern motorcycle motors
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us".
- Calvin and Hobbes

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984

“Those who believe without reason cannot be convinced by reason.”
― James Randi

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2023, 09:57:34 PM »
Wiki, 47 helicopter:

"Engines were Franklin or Lycoming vertically mounted piston engines of 178 to 305 HP (150 to 230 kW )."

That's for a full 47, max takeoff weight 2850 lbs with a 265 HP engine

https://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_47_en.php

Just for grins, call it 10-11 lb per HP or a tenth of a HP per pound.  Just for spitballing purposes with a well-engineered highly successful chopper.

(Composed and posted before seeing WLJ's post.  Man, he's fast.)


HeroHog

  • Technical Site Pig
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,210
  • It can ALWAYS get worse!
    • FaceButt Profile
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2023, 01:35:47 AM »
I bet that is a Gyrocopter and not a true helicopter @Cliffh.
I might not last very long or be very effective but I'll be a real pain in the ass for a minute!
MOLON LABE!

griz

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,131
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2023, 07:33:14 AM »

I always laughed at Broderick Crawford's ability to down a bad guy at 100 yards with his little old snubby and snap shooting.  And keep his hat on.


Apparently the pilot does all the aiming.  All he had to do was keep his hat on and pull the trigger.
Sent from a stone age computer via an ordinary keyboard.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2023, 09:30:28 AM »
I thought I heard someone say what made them really practical was when they started using turbine engines.  Gave them a lot more power. 

One of my material science professors talked about using composites for the rotors and setting it up so if the rotor started to crack or fail, you had some warning and it didn't immediately break off causing a crash.  That was in the early 1990's so I have no idea when that work was done. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

WLJ

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32,454
  • On Patrol In The Epsilon Eridani System
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2023, 09:37:49 AM »
I thought I heard someone say what made them really practical was when they started using turbine engines.  Gave them a lot more power. 


And reliability, which can't be over looked especially in helicopters 
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us".
- Calvin and Hobbes

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984

“Those who believe without reason cannot be convinced by reason.”
― James Randi

Cliffh

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,339
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2023, 02:55:50 PM »
I bet that is a Gyrocopter and not a true helicopter @Cliffh.

The plans show one overhead prop & a tail rotor w/skids, no wheels/tires.

It is, of course, supposed to be an ultra-light.

Keep in mind I bought these plans about 30 years ago.

HeroHog

  • Technical Site Pig
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,210
  • It can ALWAYS get worse!
    • FaceButt Profile
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2023, 04:07:12 PM »
The plans show one overhead prop & a tail rotor w/skids, no wheels/tires.

It is, of course, supposed to be an ultra-light.

Keep in mind I bought these plans about 30 years ago.

Ahhhh! When you said "prop" I thought propeller, not a "Rotor Blade". My bad.
I might not last very long or be very effective but I'll be a real pain in the ass for a minute!
MOLON LABE!

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,776
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2023, 07:59:10 PM »
I thought I heard someone say what made them really practical was when they started using turbine engines.  Gave them a lot more power. 

One of my material science professors talked about using composites for the rotors and setting it up so if the rotor started to crack or fail, you had some warning and it didn't immediately break off causing a crash.  That was in the early 1990's so I have no idea when that work was done.

Like  the early warning system on the Titan submersible?
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2023, 03:24:25 AM »

Warning.  One of your rotor blades is about to fall o

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,037
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2023, 08:09:42 AM »
Wiki, 47 helicopter:

"Engines were Franklin or Lycoming vertically mounted piston engines of 178 to 305 HP (150 to 230 kW )."

That's for a full 47, max takeoff weight 2850 lbs with a 265 HP engine

https://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_47_en.php

Just for grins, call it 10-11 lb per HP or a tenth of a HP per pound.  Just for spitballing purposes with a well-engineered highly successful chopper.

(Composed and posted before seeing WLJ's post.  Man, he's fast.)
Bell heli engines were used in cars, too. (Well . . . maybe one car model. With very limited production.)

"For the production models, engineers selected the O-355, made by Air Cooled Motors, it was used in many small aircraft and made for the Bell 47 helicopter. It produced 166 horsepower. Engineers modified this engine to be used in a car and water-cooled it for some reason. Preston Tucker liked these engines so much that he bought the engine company."

https://www.hotcars.com/tucker-torpedo-facts/#it-was-powered-by-an-aircraft-engine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Engine_Company
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,274
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2023, 06:57:41 PM »
I thought I heard someone say what made them really practical was when they started using turbine engines.  Gave them a lot more power. 

One of my material science professors talked about using composites for the rotors and setting it up so if the rotor started to crack or fail, you had some warning and it didn't immediately break off causing a crash.  That was in the early 1990's so I have no idea when that work was done.

Turbines sure helped but consider the H-34. Vietnam pilots loved that thing because they sat over the large radial engine that absorbed a lot of ground fire.

Lots of systems have a pressurized hollow spar on the blade and an indicator of pressure loss. My old helo was a static visual indicator but later evolved so that when one popped a little radioactive source was exposed to the sensor that picked it up when flying.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,354
  • But they're SUPPOSED to be "military-style."
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2023, 09:02:57 AM »
Turbines sure helped but consider the H-34. Vietnam pilots loved that thing because they sat over the large radial engine that absorbed a lot of ground fire.

Lots of systems have a pressurized hollow spar on the blade and an indicator of pressure loss. My old helo was a static visual indicator but later evolved so that when one popped a little radioactive source was exposed to the sensor that picked it up when flying.

Boy, that sounds Rube Goldbergish.  Was that radioactive source by any chance a phosphor-tritium light source, as in tritium gun sights?

I never really thought about it before, but those blades really go through hell, and early warning methods are a good idea:

https://newatlas.com/aircraft/bladesense-helicopter-rotor-blade-monitoring-system/

Dramamine™ special (slo mo camera on rotor hub):

https://youtu.be/gxbAoQW7cgg (1:12)

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2023, 01:48:56 PM »
Like  the early warning system on the Titan submersible?
The way he described it, the composite would use long fibers lengthwise that were much stronger than the matrix material.  So if the composite cracked through, the fibers would hold on and keep the rotor from coming apart and unbalancing the whole system.  I think the idea was to turn a hard crash into an emergency landing.  Like I said, this was 30 years ago when I heard the story so I don't know if anything like that is used now. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,274
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: How the hell did helicopters ever get to be practical?
« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2023, 10:54:48 PM »
Integrated Blade Inspection System used Strontium-90 for a source. I remember them so well because I cut the crap out of my hand on one when a wrench slipped.

I miss my time working on helos but ones today seem too boring to go back to. I was on some of the last great mechanical beasts, H-3s or S-61 in civvie trim.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.