Author Topic: Saving the planet by buying it  (Read 1430 times)

Ron

  • Guest
Saving the planet by buying it
« on: June 12, 2007, 06:18:06 AM »
 American buys slices of South America

By SHANE ROMIG, Associated Press WriterSat Jun 9, 7:25 PM ET

The American multimillionaire who founded the North Face and Esprit clothing lines says he is trying to save the planet by buying bits of it. First Douglas Tompkins purchased a huge swath of southern Chile, and now he's hoping to save the northeast wetlands of neighboring Argentina.

He has snapped up more than half a million acres of the Esteros del Ibera, a vast Argentine marshland teeming with wildlife.

Tompkins, 64, is a hero to some for his environmental stewardship. Others resent his land purchases as a foreign challenge to their national patrimony.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Tompkins said industrialized agriculture is chewing up big chunks of Argentina's fragile marshland and savanna, and that essential topsoil is disappearing as a result.

"Everywhere I look here in Argentina I see massive abuse of the soil ... just like what happened in the U.S. 20 or 30 years ago," he said.

Tompkins hopes to do in Argentina what he did in Chile  create broad stretches of land protected from agribusiness or industrial development, and one day turn them over to the government as nature reserves.

Wealthy foreigners have bought an estimated 4.5 million acres in Argentina and Chile in the past 15 years for private Patagonian playgrounds. Sylvester Stallone, Ted Turner and Italian fashion designer Luciano Benetton all have large holdings set amid pristine mountains and lakes.

Tompkins was among the early ones, buying a 35-mile-wide strip of Chile from a Pacific coastal bay to the country's Andean mountain border with Argentina. He said his purchases were intended specifically to protect the environment.

Argentine officials took notice and eagerly courted Tompkins' philanthropy, flying him to several areas of ecological significance in the late 1990s  when the government was strapped for cash because of the economic crisis.

"The land conservation budget was burning a hole in our pocket," Tompkins said.

He bought a 120,000-acre ranch in 1998 and has increased his Argentine holdings to nearly 600,000 acres since then. He now owns well over 1 million acres in Chile and Argentina, a combined area about the size of Rhode Island.

The financial details of the transactions were not disclosed because they were private deals between Tompkins and landowners. There was no major opposition to the deals initially because Tompkins bought the land parcels gradually, keeping a low profile.

Critics now weave many conspiracy theories, accusing Tompkins of seeking control of one of South America's biggest fresh water reserves, and worrying that he might never cede the lands to the state.

"These lands should not belong to an individual, much less a foreigner," said Luis D'Elia, who argues the American could gain "control of resources that are going to be scarce in the future, like water."

Tompkins' Argentine holdings sit atop the huge Guarani Aquifer, which extends north into Paraguay.

Last year, D'Elia, then a minister in Argentina's left-leaning cabinet, accused Tompkins of blocking access to public roads and cut through some locked gates to the land trust's property.

"He blundered in cutting the provincial road, the only access for the people living in the area," D'Elia argued.

This month lawmakers in Corrientes province, where the wetlands are located, modified the local constitution to block foreigners from buying land considered a strategic resource. The law appeared to target any new attempts by Tompkins to increase his holdings.

Tompkins responded in an e-mailed statement from his publicist that such changes would be unconstitutional and likely trigger legal challenges.

Jose Luis Niella, a Catholic priest and social activist, said many poor people no longer have access to lands where ancestors lived freely for generations. "It's not fair for him to be concerned only with protecting the environment," Niella said.

In Chile, independent Sen. Antonio Horvath said the Chilean government must have final say on land usage, complaining that Tompkins' purchases were "effectively splitting the country in two."

Opposition lawmakers in both countries have sought unsuccessfully to expropriate Tompkins' purchases or put limits on extremely large landholdings.

The Argentine wetlands remain wild for now, with marsh deer feeding on tall grasses, families of capybaras splashing through the muddy water and caymans sunning themselves on the banks of small islands. An ostrich-like nandu tries to peck its way in through a screen door at one of the eco-tourism lodges opened for visitors in three renovated ranch houses.

Tompkins' Conservation Land Trust recently released its first anteater into the wild and wants to reintroduce otters and even jaguars.

Tompkins shrugs off the protests.

"If you had to go to bed every night thinking about every accusation that would come up the next day, you'd be consumed," he said. "Some of that stuff is laughable. ... You've just got to live with that and focus on the things you're doing."

Tompkins insists he'll eventually return the land to both governments to be preserved as nature reserves or parks, but will hold onto it for now "as a very good example of what private conservation can do."

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2007, 06:45:59 AM »
As long as he stays out of Montana ...   rolleyes
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Nick1911

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,492
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2007, 06:48:06 AM »
I have no problem with environmentalists putting their money where their mouth is.

That said;  I wonder what the going rate is for raw land in Chile and Argentina?

Ron

  • Guest
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2007, 06:59:52 AM »
The article says it will eventually be turned over to the gooberment.

Then the Fed Gov there will own a disproportionate amount of land not unlike what we have going on out west.

I just don't get warm fuzzies from the government owning so much land.

Places like Yellowstone I understand, I don't know, I am conflicted as an environmentalist/libertarian/conservative mix. undecided

Nick1911

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,492
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2007, 07:26:21 AM »
The article says it will eventually be turned over to the gooberment.

Then the Fed Gov there will own a disproportionate amount of land not unlike what we have going on out west.

I just don't get warm fuzzies from the government owning so much land.

Places like Yellowstone I understand, I don't know, I am conflicted as an environmentalist/libertarian/conservative mix. undecided

Tough call.  The way I see it is that a private investor can do whatever they wish with the land - including give it to the government.

BryanP

  • friendly hermit
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,808
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2007, 05:54:20 AM »
There is at least one conservation organization in the US that does the same thing.  The Nature Conservancy buys up land using donated money.  I can respect that.  Put your money where your beliefs are.
"Inaccurately attributed quotes are the bane of the internet" - Abraham Lincoln

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,913
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2007, 11:16:32 AM »
Quote
"Everywhere I look here in Argentina I see massive abuse of the soil ... just like what happened in the U.S. 20 or 30 years ago," he said.
Isn't he a bit off on his years?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Nick1911

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,492
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2007, 11:24:46 AM »
Quote
"Everywhere I look here in Argentina I see massive abuse of the soil ... just like what happened in the U.S. 20 or 30 years ago," he said.
Isn't he a bit off on his years?

Hmm...  When I originally read the article, I thought he was referring to the Dust Bowl.  He must be referring to something else?  undecided

Art Eatman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,442
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2007, 05:11:57 AM »
""Everywhere I look here in Argentina I see massive abuse of the soil ... just like what happened in the U.S. 20 or 30 years ago," he said."

This is the equivalent of the all-inclusive soundbite on TV, omitting any real information or any use of "some".

In the U.S., some farmers plowed uphill/downhill, which is stupid.  Others left crop lands idle after harvest, not deep-plowing cross-prevailing-wind or planting cover crops.  OTOH, many farmers avoided these practices.

Same for ranching.  Some have overgrazed; some are doing so now.  Sagebrush is a replacement growth where grasslands have been overgrazed.  That reduces habitat for bighorn sheep, but helps the mule deer.  And hurts the land's carrying capacity for cattle.  My area was horribly overgrazed in the WW I era, and has yet to recover.  Same for the valley area from Phoenix to Tucson.  Creosote bush and lecheguilla are replacement growths.

You buy it, do nothing on some and do some restoration on some.   You can run livestock on some in a manner that itself is restorative.

If you don't develop the land for residential/commercial/industrial use, it will still be there if a real need arises beyond profit alone.  (I'm all for profit, but there's more to life than $$$.  Hunting is one of my needs, e.g.)

The Nature Conservancy deals sound good, but their restrictions can be onerous to ranchers and outdoorsmen.  Some of what they do is very good, but as usual there's no such thing as perfection.  A problem is the usual one of city folks defining what's "natural".

Art
The American Indians learned what happens when you don't control immigration.

ConfuseUs

  • friend
  • New Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2007, 09:37:52 AM »
I bet to the average Argentine or Chilean it looks like another arrogant Yanqui with too much money buying up the best land assets in the country. I don't suppose that this guy ever considered starting a foundation to encourage good land use practices in South America. Gosh, that would be more work than just buying the land and surrounding it with razor wire.

Art Eatman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,442
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2007, 05:36:43 AM »
"...a foundation to encourage good land use practices in South America."

"My daddy done it this way, and his daddy done it this way, and I'm a-doin' it this way."  Think "Peace Corps" and the history of failure at changing the ways of backwards people.  Individually, the Peace Corps people made a lot of friends, but they didn't do much in the way of making change.

And why would South Americans be any more interested in Reality than we in the U.S.?  Perception is far more important than fact.

Art
The American Indians learned what happens when you don't control immigration.

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Saving the planet by buying it
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2007, 06:58:48 AM »
Quote
I have no problem with environmentalists putting their money where their mouth is.
+1 I can actually repsect what he's doing. He's doing more for the environment than 1,000,000 others combined who put 'save the rainforest' bumperstickers on their cars.
Didn't Ted Turner also buy up huge swaths of land in the American West?

The most amuzing thing about the whole article is the theme of leftists fighting over property rights. cheesy
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama