First: A few quick searches don't reveal to me that this topic has been raised before; if it has, I'd really appreciate a link to the discussion, and I apologize in advance for the redundancy.
Now, the meat: I've heard over the years several conflicting things about credit cards; without listing the whole range of absolutely indisputable, 100pct and incontestably true facts (many of which don't fit in the same universe of possibilities), my question is this:
Do merchants who accept credit cards (I'm specifically thinking of American Express, but would enjoy a compare / contrast session, if there are differences, involving the other major ones) have the right to routinely check photo ID under the terms of their merchant agreements? My long-time understanding (I read it on the innernets and it sounded well backed and true, but I don't have handy a link to whatever page / pages I read this on) is that No, they don't -- that a valid card (that is, one that is successfully authorized) with a valid signature (that is, one that is on the back of the card and can be reproduced by the holder) *is* the form of ID they can check. Further, I've heard that a merchant who refuses to accept this deal by insisting on looking at "state issued Photo ID" (or whatever ID they think acceptable) can be fined; the amount I read about was $2,000. If that's a made up number, it's made up -- but it's the amount that was named
Personally, I dislike showing photo ID (dislike having it, generally, but that's an issue I won't grouse too much about in this thread), and I dislike reliance on misguided, idiotic "store policy" reasons. (Here, too, better rants than mine are out there, brimming with thoughts like "Since when are grocery clerks experts on determining the authenticity of credit cards *or* other things in my wallet?")
However, after an angry, time-wasting "confrontation" the other day in a grocery store (they must have plenty of business to treat my custom as completely expendable), I seek counsel:
Can anyone point me to definitive information that says I'm right? (Or that I'm just a time-wasting idiot, essentially what the grocery store manager maintained). That she was wearing a full veil (eyes only visible) made me wonder exactly what looking at photo ID would allow a clerk to confirm in *her* case, but ... eh, a useless digression.
Now, you might say, "Why not just ask the credit card company?" Good point; I've tried a few times, and decided they seem to have an attitude of intentional opaquery; I think it's a fairly straightforward question, but it's one they refuse to acknowledge is understandable. "Perhaps that's just a store policy," I've been told. "But that isn't what I'm asking," I try to explain. "I'm asking whether they in fact have agreed to terms which forbid them from asking that." This usually gets an answer of "Perhaps that's just a store policy."
From people who have posted their own stories on this topic online, some store managers have conveyed something along the lines that they are authorized to ask for ID *only* if a card is not signed.
So, before I go completely nuts, can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks!
timothy