I've always thought it to be very interesting that Trent Lott can simply praise Strom Thurmond obliquely and be crucified out of his senate leadership position as a racist, and this piece of *expletive deleted*it can have the hood and robe hanging in his closet and still be a beloved scion of the Democratic... er... Hypocritic Party.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/18/AR2005061801105.htmlI especially love this quote...
"The 770-page book is the latest in a long series of attempts by the 87-year-old Democratic patriarch to try to explain an event early in his life that threatens to define him nearly as much as his achievements in the Senate. In it, Byrd says he viewed the Klan as a useful platform from which to launch his political career. He described it essentially as a fraternal group of elites -- doctors, lawyers, clergy, judges and other "upstanding people" who at no time engaged in or preached violence against blacks, Jews or Catholics, who historically were targets of the Klan."
Political spinning at its worst. He damned well knew what the Klan was in the south, especially at that time.
"While Byrd provides the most detailed description of his early involvement with the Klan, conceding that he reflected "the fears and prejudices I had heard throughout my boyhood," the account is not complete. He does not acknowledge the full length of time he spent as a Klan organizer and advocate. Nor does he make any mention of a particularly incendiary letter he wrote in 1945 complaining about efforts to integrate the military."
I'd love to see a copy of that letter...
"He suggested that his career should be judged in light of all that he did subsequently to help lift his state out of poverty, and to bring basic and critically needed services and infrastructure to West Virginia."
It didn't work for Trent Lott, why should it work for him? In fact, the whole Trent Lott debacle is referenced.
I wonder if a Democrat praises Byrd, will he go down in flames, too?