Maybe David should be more careful with what he pulls out of his pants.
This wouldn't be the first false accusation of rape/molestation against a famous person either. I'm not saying that this situation is false, just that false accusations have happened.
A credible witness to the crime is proof. I don't believe that every rape accusation should be required to come with CSI style evidence to prove the case.
How do you define 'credible'? I certainly wouldn't want to see another Duke type situation occurring.
I certainly don't need CSI style evidence - but I do want 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. To me, that requires multiple witnesses or at least some physical evidence. DNA samples, evidence of struggle, video tapes, even sound tapes would all help.
It gets especially complicated if it's a case of 'date rape' where the woman at least initially consented. I especially dislike the cases where the woman decides that she doesn't consent the day after. For example, one case the man and woman were actually in the act, the woman said 'no, stop', he stopped pulled out, and presumably went to sulk*.
Afterwards she reported it as rape to the police on the urging of female friends, and he found himself up on rape charges - because he was 'in' when she said 'no'.
*I know I would.