^
its awl cpehkyewlashun thow:
"probably"
"more evidence that"
"bad latin/good latin"
"she argues that"
I'll go along with the poetic evidence, though, in terms of one pronounciation fitting the meter better than another.
(Besides, he said, parenthetically, I was just making a wisecrack. However, this extra information is helpful, so thanks.)
And, he added with a grin, how are future linguistic analysts, reading this 1000 years from now, going to figure out how to pronounce the "^" in my first paragraph?
Or the "&" in "Smith & Wesson?"
Or the "(" and ")" in my parenthetical remarks?
Or the """ I just used.
Terry giggleth.
Anyhow, more power to the Delta Party if they want to CHANGE the direction of the country toward the right.
Less power to them if they want to take our direction still more to the left.
However:
From San Diego
Has foreign interests
Described as "a progressive Democrat" in wiki.
Although none of those are inherently bad, all of them (pardon my well-founded redneck post-judices) are "indicators" that he is another leftist.
More power to him if he draws votes (especially electoral votes) away from... <ahem> that other leftist candidate.
Terry, 230RN